We performed a comparison between LogRhythm SIEM and Power Admin PA File Sight based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."I would say the most valuable feature of LogRhythm is that it has built-in UEBA functionality, among other basic Windows packages."
"LogRhythm has increased productivity because all the tools that we need are in the web UI, allowing us to find threats on our network fast and efficiently."
"Alarms are the most valuable feature. We also like the dashboard and how things are at your fingertips. The fact that we can now edit the report templates is going to be a great thing."
"The product is great for medium to large-scale organizations."
"Currently, we are in the implementation phase. LogRhythm is better than QRadar from the point of view of collecting Windows events. It has a much higher view. You can enable monitoring by default."
"The initial setup process is very user-friendly."
"It's reliable and the performance is good."
"The most valuable features would be the automation, reporting, and the support."
"The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement."
"I think they probably need to, because a lot of companies are having this cloud-first strategy, where anything that's new has to go into the cloud for some reason."
"I would like it to do a lot of the automation (which I still need to learn more about), because I am essentially a one man shop doing all the jobs. I'd like for it to be able to do more for me."
"I have probably submitted half a dozen log parser requests, and I keep finding more stuff that we need to keep an eye on that doesn't have a definition in LogRhythm."
"I don't think the cloud model in LogRhythm is developed enough."
"The installation was a bit complex because we are running a virtual infrastructure."
"We've tried to work with a couple of engineering department guys there. We've called them and called them but we never hear anything back."
"There are other security technologies outside of this SIEM that should be inside of this SIEM. I can see in their roadmap that they're trying to address a lot of these things, and have these technologies built into the solution, because there is no point in going to another vendor or opening up a second window to obtain the data that you need."
"Only area I can think of to improve on is the proof reading and using the guides before releasing them. Out the the 20+ guides I used one had issues with wrong information in it."
"The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex."
LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 7th in Log Management with 166 reviews while Power Admin PA File Sight is ranked 39th in Log Management with 1 review. LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4, while Power Admin PA File Sight is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Power Admin PA File Sight writes "Good stability and preferred choice for DLP needs over other solutions". LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh and LogRhythm Axon, whereas Power Admin PA File Sight is most compared with .
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.