JD Edwards World vs Meridian ProjectTalk comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
1,679 views|1,440 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Meridian Logo
76 views|64 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JD Edwards World and Meridian ProjectTalk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP.
To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of JD Edwards World is reasonable. Since it is a legacy solution the price has been reduced."
  • "The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable."
  • "You have to pay for a license, and the license cost is calculated based on the number of users you have."
  • More JD Edwards World Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Oracle could make more integration processes.
    Top Answer:We use the solution for managing sales, warehouse, manufacturing process, etc.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    16th
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    1,679
    Comparisons
    1,440
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.0
    51st
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    76
    Comparisons
    64
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ProjectTalk
    Learn More
    Meridian
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Oracle's JD Edwards World single platform solution enables better collaboration both within and outside your business network. Get all of your lines of business working together sharing information, boosting performance, trimming costs, and driving profitable growth. ERP Suite.
    Full-featured project management, collaboration and scheduling solution to which you access via the Internet.
    Sample Customers
    SICIM S.p.A., Fabbrica d'Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A, Atrium European Real Estate, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Calumet Specialty Partners, LP Products, Grupo Arcor, Original BUFF S.A., Shelf Drilling Ltd., African + Eastern, Westfield Group LLC, Sportmaster Ltd., Beijing Xinladao Restaurant Group
    IBM Cognos, Informative Graphics
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company19%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Construction Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise61%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    ERP
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    JD Edwards World is ranked 16th in ERP with 11 reviews while Meridian ProjectTalk is ranked 51st in ERP. JD Edwards World is rated 8.0, while Meridian ProjectTalk is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of JD Edwards World writes "A good legacy solution that is reliable and has good support". On the other hand, JD Edwards World is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Pronto Xi, whereas Meridian ProjectTalk is most compared with .

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.