We performed a comparison between JBoss ESB and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."
"The stability is good."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"How simple it is to create new solutions."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."
"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
JBoss ESB is ranked 14th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. JBoss ESB is rated 7.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". JBoss ESB is most compared with Mule ESB, Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus and IBM Integration Bus, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.