We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Radware DefenseFlow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The complete solution is valuable for everything it delivers and the protection it offers."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"The dashboard is good and user-friendly."
"The three-second service level agreement is already better than the competition."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it is easy to configure."
"It blocks all types of attacks."
"The tool's machine learning and artificial intelligence help to prevent attacks by analyzing real-time traffic."
"Recently, our company has been facing difficulties due to attacks originating from the Russian Federation. DefenseFlow has proven to be a highly effective solution in protecting our customers."
"Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments."
"It's quite expensive."
"The solution should integrate with something that looks at continuous security management."
"Certificate management could be improved."
"The log analytics interface within Incapsula isn't really good. For example, if you have to get all logs from there, it's a very cumbersome process."
"The cost could be lower; our end clients need to have a high budget to purchase this solution."
"I miss being able to integrate the dashboard with other BI tools we are using. We have to export and import data to be able to present it, and doing so is a lot of work."
"Imperva DDoS does not provide version control."
"Its documentation is not 100% clear, making it the weakest aspect of Radware. We have encountered some difficulties in understanding how to configure it correctly."
"Radware DefenseFlow should add new features and algorithms to make it efficient."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 7th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 74 reviews while Radware DefenseFlow is ranked 23rd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 2 reviews. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Radware DefenseFlow is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefenseFlow writes "A security solution to protect networks with extensive troubleshooting". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Radware DefenseFlow is most compared with Radware DefensePro and Arbor DDoS.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.