We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Functional Tester and mabl based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews while mabl is ranked 34th in Functional Testing Tools. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.2, while mabl is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, HCL OneTest, Selenium HQ and Worksoft Certify, whereas mabl is most compared with Functionize, Tricentis Tosca and Selenium HQ.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.