We performed a comparison between IBM Event Streams and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The system efficiently processes and calculates the data flow within the cluster using DLP functionality."
"I'm an administrator, and what I like most is the interface, the security, and the storage."
"The stability has been good."
"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"The security is great."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the provided SDKs."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"In the next release, I would like to see the GUI allow you to configure the security section."
"It would be helpful if they could help us explain why they, as in, the customers, should use the product and the overall benefits."
"The product's interface needs improvement."
"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."
"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
"I’d like this dashboard to use web sockets, so it would actually be in real time. It would slightly increase debugging, etc."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
IBM Event Streams is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 39 reviews. IBM Event Streams is rated 8.4, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Event Streams writes "Easy to use, stable, has a good interface, and the security is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". IBM Event Streams is most compared with Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and IBM MQ, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and Red Hat AMQ. See our IBM Event Streams vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
