We performed a comparison between IBM Case Foundation and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The solution is scalable."
"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."
"Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."
"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"The cloud version could use more stability."
"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
IBM Case Foundation is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.