We performed a comparison between IBM Case Foundation and Informatica Business Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."
"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."
"The content management is great."
"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's very easy."
"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it."
"Informatica Business Process Manager is easy to use and learn."
"I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities."
"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone."
IBM Case Foundation is ranked 27th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 20th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8, while Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "An easy-to-use solution for ETL purposes ". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Apache Airflow, Camunda and Oracle BPM. See our IBM Case Foundation vs. Informatica Business Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
