We performed a comparison between i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The solution has high support capability."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pros →
"Password sharing and SSO. These features almost become a necessity to make sure that company data is safe and reduce the possibility of data breach."
"It is nice to be able to use my Touch ID and have access to all my passwords in one place."
"It has a double authentication factor increasing the security level."
"Keeper was user-friendly."
"The chat support is quick. I have never encountered any problems. On the contrary, they have been very helpful and kind."
"Auto login across platforms allows for no copying and pasting."
"I like Keeper's mobility and its accessibility."
"Keeper Bridge."
"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."
"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Cons →
"The organization of items needs improvement. For example, when I log onto the cloud version as well, everything is shown on my folder. It is hard to differentiate between files and documents in my list of items I have stored inside."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"The technical support has no experience."
"API possible needs improvement. Although, this feature is for enterprises which need more then the usual usage."
"Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
"Maybe a sort of category organizer to help with organizing passwords for different things, such as banking, medical, shopping, and school."
"Needs to provide an API to be integrated with the information systems and offer secure file hosting service with sharing and editing capabilities."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 27th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Keeper is ranked 11th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
