HPE ConvergedSystem vs IBM PurePower System vs Oracle SuperCluster comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
1,215 views|714 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
125 views|44 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
365 views|133 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE ConvergedSystem, IBM PurePower System, and Oracle SuperCluster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Converged Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The user interface, reporting, and management are good, and we are quite happy with the performance.""The most valuable features of the solution are the flexibility and the availability of the machines.""Consolidation and duplications features.""The most valuable features of HPE ConvergedSystem are scalability and resilience.""We use the solution for DDI.""The tool's most valuable features are stability and scalability.""This solution is very simple to use.""The flexibility is the most advantageous aspect of the solution. Our system has a very big environment. Due to this, the replication and backup operation is not an easy task. We prefer HPE SimpliVity modules in our environment, even when we have some different cases in operations."

More HPE ConvergedSystem Pros →

"We never have any issues or glitches."

More IBM PurePower System Pros →

"SuperCluster is basically a combination of Oracle, with Exadata and Compute node features, so it is a computing cluster that is integrated in a single infrastructure such that we don't need a separate solution for the application database, the data storage database, and everything else the application needs.""A valuable feature is the Exadata Storage appliance, optimized for database queries.""Because it's classified as an engineered system, it's all integrated, it's all supported by one vendor. We don't have to go to multiple vendors for support, it's all integrated under Oracle.""Unix is not as easy for the users, it needs more maintenance and costs extra.""Our primary use case is for E-Business Suite applications the applications for the government, and most of the applications that use an HCM.""Scalability and technical support.""Because SuperCluster is a specially engineered system, we have confidence in that all the components are compatible with one another. Everything runs together as a well-coupled group of machines, and the performance is great (especially the memory).""The two features that I find to be the most valuable are high availability and high performance."

More Oracle SuperCluster Pros →

Cons
"The solution has a complicated front-end.""HPE ConvergedSystem needs to improve its price.""Features that should be addressed concern the HPE functionality and the interaction with VMware.""Pricing is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required.""The solution needs to add NFS features.""The MTG inside HP could be improved.""There is some scope for improvement in support. The response time could be better.""I would like to see monitoring solutions included, as well as brand support."

More HPE ConvergedSystem Cons →

"The management is really difficult when it comes to systems with traditional services."

More IBM PurePower System Cons →

"It's not working as we expected. We thought it would be fast and reliable but we are not getting the reliability. It's not stable.""If they had an application that centralized the administration, not about the monitoring, but for the configuration, it would be better.""A major issue for us is that after the most recent update of SuperCluster, they have now stopped all future production of new versions. That is to say, after M7 there was M8, and now there are no future versions planned (e.g. M9) in the market.""We have faced network connectivity issues.""I would like to see control domain and zone management via a management console, similar to that of OVM.""There are many areas for improvement. For example, better guidance in terms of troubleshooting issues relating to ZFS, as well as better tools/diagnostics for monitoring that specific component, to better identify potential issues. Hardware monitoring via OEM 13.2 is not 100 percent, as Ops Center is still required in some instances.""Not a very user friendly solution.""They may have made some improvements but based on the version that I am using, it is a little complicated because it is based on the Unix Operating system."

More Oracle SuperCluster Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good. We have not calculated what hyper-converged infrastructure has brought us but I think there has to be some lower cost for us, compared to the public cloud. Obviously, there would be a lower cost, probably by more than half."
  • "This is an expensive system and not every customer has the kind of budget to support it."
  • "The pricing is sensitive."
  • "This is an expensive solution."
  • "My company has a five year contract for HPE ConvergedSystem. The contracts depend on companies and sometimes it can be three years. The solution is worth its price."
  • "There are some extra costs in addition to the licensing costs for the yearly maintenance from professional third-party services."
  • "The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
  • "The pricing is competitive. Not a major problem. We have a subscription model."
  • More HPE ConvergedSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "For us, the licensing costs are a large amount, but we are also paying for the rack, the SLA, and other extras. When I look into our organization's requirements regarding performance, machine load, etc., I believe that, while expensive, SuperCluster is nevertheless good for us."
  • "Due to the multiple products involved in our use of SuperCluster (including different software, hardware, etc.), I cannot comment on the licensing aspect."
  • More Oracle SuperCluster Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Converged Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the solution are the flexibility and the availability of the machines.
    Top Answer:I rate the product price an eight and a half on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:Pricing is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:In this setup, the traffic is distributed among the nodes, enhancing the overall performance compared to a scenario… more »
    Top Answer:Due to the multiple products involved in our use of SuperCluster (including different software, hardware, etc.), I… more »
    Top Answer:We have faced network connectivity issues.
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    1,215
    Comparisons
    714
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    8.6
    11th
    Views
    125
    Comparisons
    44
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    7th
    Views
    365
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    543
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE ConvergedSystem 700, HPE ConvergedSystem for SAP HANA, CS500, HPE ConvergedSystem 900, HPE ConvergedSystem 500, HPE ConvergedSystem 300
    Oracle MiniCluster, S7-2, M7, M6-32
    Learn More
    Overview

    HPE ConvergedSystem gives you lower cost of ownership and greater flexibility to meet more business demands. Eliminate the inefficiencies and inflexibility of one-silo-at-a-time infrastructure with software-defined agility and automation.

    Deploy pre-validated, factory-tested configurations in weeks instead of months. Set up IT services in minutes, not hours. Integrated, workload-optimised systems eliminate infrastructure silos for improved efficiency, simplicity and speed.

    IBM PurePower System offering combines storage devices, networking devices, virtualization capabilities, and management functions into a single infrastructure. The IBM PurePower System offering is provided in several single rack and multiple-rack configurations and vary over time as technology and offerings are increased.

    Secure cloud infrastructure with the industry’s most advanced security, extreme performance, and a complete suite of efficiency enhancements, tools, and automation that work together to dramatically lower cost and complexity.

    Sample Customers
    FAW-Volkswagen, NICS, NBrIX, Pinpoint, HPE Technology Services, SWS, Ko Sistem, HPE
    Information Not Available
    Advania, Dimension Data, Atos, Etisilat Nigeria, HDFC, Specialized Bicycle Components, Uganda Revenue Authority, iQor, United Energy, Portic Barcelona, B Logistics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, CSC, CNSI, REDISA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Consumer Goods Company14%
    Pharma/Biotech Company14%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Government9%
    Educational Organization7%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Government22%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Logistics Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Non Profit8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise59%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Converged Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.