HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] vs VMAX [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hitachi Vantara Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
12,456 views|4,776 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Dell Technologies Logo
views| comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL], HPE 3PAR StoreServ, and VMAX [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Vantara, IBM, Dell Technologies and others in Frame-Based Disk Arrays.
To learn more, read our detailed Frame-Based Disk Arrays Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are simplified provisioning and management, de-duplication, and built-in encryption."

More Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] Pros →

"If you design it right and implement it right, it's headache free. Just keep it there and it does what it's suppose to do.""I have a lot of applications that need higher IOPS, and 3PAR achieves this operation normally without any issues for the management.""We deployed 3PAR in the national and international markets. It's not bad, the solution.""It is reliable, and it seems like a solid product. It has been working well so far.""It was the easiest SAN that I have ever set up.""The speed is very good.""The tool is fast and easy to use. You can also configure it easily. The product also has good performance tuning.""HPE can login, fix things, alert us to things, and upgrade. We are there and aware, but we do not do the work. So, that is good."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Pros →

"We have been able to present storage from the VMAX to hosts without any problems.""A rock solid foundation to deploy applications which cannot incur a disruption of service.""We have never had a bad experience with it because we never had failures. It has good data availability and the performance is also okay.""VMAX3 is our main system for storage. All our systems and all our virtualizations are connected to it. In terms of expanding it, we are replacing it with a new system, the PowerMax 2000. So our current VMAX3 platform will be decommissioned soon. We are switching to PowerMax 2000 because we are looking for improved performance. We see it as the best fit for our requirements in terms of the performance and the overall cost.""The interface is good, and it is also customizable.""The most valuable features are the interface and performance.""I like the many new features, especially the all-flash solution.""Deploying, Expanding, and Modifying systems are easier than ever."

More VMAX [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"The exterior display needs to be improved."

More Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] Cons →

"This solution only provides active-passive replication, as opposed to active-active.""An area of improvement for this solution is an increase in the bandwidth as well as an upgrade of the storage functionality and capabilities. The storage needs to be expandable for future-proofing.""HPE 3PAR StoreServ could have better integration into the cloud and converged infrastructure.""We are using a built-in solution in 3PAR. We are using All-Flash Storage, and there are some difficulties with it. HPE has now developed a new tool system to support All-Flash, and that's why we are changing our investment. They must increase its performance. I want unlimited support, which is very important for performance. I am not interested in spinning disks. HPE is developing new storage systems called Primera, but they must be developed more.""Upgrades on them are a bit tricky. For us to do a head swap on one is a full outer joiner storage frame, which is obviously not that easy to do in a production environment.""I would like to see more cloud-based integrations and more file storage capabilities.""Security is a mandatory feature because our customer needs to protect delicate information.""This product has come to the end of its lifecycle."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Cons →

"The pricing is a bit expensive. That is the reason we are now currently we are looking for other solutions. That's the reason we are looking at AFF and Unity. We are also considering PowerStore.""I would like to see support for high-availability.""I would like this solution to integrate the solution that EMC vPlex offers.""The cluster support should be improved.""Resilience replication, reporting, and performance need to be improved.""Better speed to release new features that have become industry standards. EMC created so many standards in the past. Now, it seems they are playing a me-too game and lagging behind in some areas, specifically data reduction.""The way you configure larger size volumes needs improvement.""I'd like to see improvements where we can scale out an existing array and remove older controllers\drives\etc., within the same subsystem."

More VMAX [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This solution has a good price-performance ratio."
  • More Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's very reliable and it was cost competitive with other arrays at the time that we purchased it."
  • "The main issue with 3PAR right now is its cost problem. Right now, there are some other storage cabinets that can do what 3PAR can do. Now, they can do it as well with a more revised budget."
  • "To be more competitive, as customer, we need a more aggressive price that includes all the licenses available."
  • "Nowadays, from a storage point of view, there are so many vendors in the market. So cost is one of the factors that pushed us to go with HPE 3PAR. Cost-wise they're pretty competitive."
  • "As a school, we always have​ low budgets. We are a nonprofit organization. We do not have too much budget, so we care about prices, discounts, and especially about the product quality. The last 16 years, we have been an HPE customer. We are very much happy with HPE products."
  • "It is fairly inexpensive to scale."
  • "Budget wise, 3PAR is a lot of money compared to other solutions, but what is in the 3PAR integration that customers are getting now from the Nimble and InfoSight acquisitions, it is worthwhile."
  • "For the price that we were able to acquire it, we have seen it give us the performance and stability that we require to run our enterprise."
  • More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are additional costs to the standard licensing fee, and it just depends on the package."
  • "Our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "Our licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
  • More VMAX [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Frame-Based Disk Arrays solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a few posts already. In 2015, though, the HP giant began to rouse and challenge the mainstream status quo with its 3PAR offering. Quantifying 3PAR's platform is different from XtremIO and Pure, though, as it can seem amorphous given the many ways it can be quoted. Are you asking for all flash? 3PAR will give you that and lay claim to the best-of-breed title. Oh, but you want some mass storage akin to archival or virtual tape, too? 3PAR changes jerseys and shouts, "I'm it!" Is it, though? Let's put 3PAR against XtremIO and see how they measure up! Define the Conversation  The hard part about these comparisons and competitive analyses is that we aren't talking about products of the same species or specialization. I struggle to put it properly, but consider it this way. In pre-AFA days (the age of traditional spinners like NetApp FAS3040, EMC CLARiiON or VNX, and even last-gen 3PAR), the contest was like pitting a Toyota Camry against a Nissan Altima. They did most of the same things with minor strengths, weaknesses, and preferences. Talking about XtremIO versus 3PAR 74xx is more of a discussion about construction-grade, heavy-duty cranes versus massive earth movers. They are in the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective… more »
    Top Answer:The tool’s price is higher compared to other products. The solution is 20% more expensive than other storage.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Frame-Based Disk Arrays
    9th
    out of 48 in All-Flash Storage
    Views
    12,456
    Comparisons
    4,776
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    268
    Rating
    8.4
    Unranked
    In Frame-Based Disk Arrays
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HUS VM
    HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage
    Symmetrix VMAX
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Hitachi Universal Storage Platform VM delivers proven enterprise-class functionality — advanced virtualization of externally attached storage, logical partitioning, thin provisioning and universal replication — in flexible, cost effective service oriented configurations. 

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ is an AI-driven storage solution that prevents issues before they occur by learning and adjusting in real time. The solution offers a tier-1 all-flash foundation for mission-critical workloads. HPE 3PAR StoreServ was designed with more than 3M IOPS and consistent sub-ms latency. It aims to transform midrange and enterprise deployments with solutions that scale from a few TBs to more than 20PBs. In addition, the solution is built to modernize data centers and is made to handle unpredictable workloads effortlessly. By implementing HPE 3PAR StoreServ, you gain automated and rapid provisioning, hardware-accelerated deduplication and compression, and a multi-tenant design.

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ Features

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Flexibility: With HPE 3PAR StoreServ, you can easily deploy highly configurable, scale-out storage for multi-tenant workloads.
    • Always-on availability for your data: HPE 3PAR StoreServ includes an always-on resilient storage infrastructure for your hypervisors and applications. In addition, with Peer Persistence, your virtual machines (VMs), hosts, and data can move freely across data centers rather than being constrained by their physical boundaries.
    • Fast, scalable performance: HPE 3PAR StoreServ enables you to accelerate consistent mixed-workload performance and also provides necessary QoS levels that are optimized for your highest priority applications.
    • Performance insights: HPE 3PAR StoreServ helps you gain performance insights in real time, and anticipate as well as prevent issues across the infrastructure stack by utilizing cross-stack analytics.
    • Flash optimized data protection: With tier-1 data services, multi-tenant security, and copy data management, you can avoid downtime.
    • Seamless data mobility: HPE 3PAR StoreServ makes it possible for you to not only experience converged data protection, but also experience seamless data mobility services, at flash speed, from the edge to the cloud.

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing HPE 3PAR StoreServ. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Easy to manage. The web interface to manage the units is a great asset and one that makes managing storage easy.
    • User-friendly GUI
    • Exceptionally fast and well-managed replication

    • Low latency
    • Hybrid storage gives you the ability to assign different roles to different types of storage arrays inside one enclosure
    • Both file-level and block-level replication

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the HPE 3PAR StoreServ solution.

    A SAN Consultant at a tech services company says, “One of the features that I like the most is the data replication element. The reason I like it is due to the fact that it's pretty clean on replicating data over to a second site. The product stands on its own in heavy enterprise environments. It's easy to make changes without affecting the environment. The solution is very easy to use. The product is very robust and offers very good performance.”

    A Storage Manager at a financial services firm mentions, "There are a lot of screens for easy management where you can change some settings. But after a few years, the important settings were better after an upgrade, and all the vendors have other ways to upgrade their systems."

    A Senior IT Infrastructure & Data Center Operation Engineer at Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT) comments, “The adaptive optimization is the biggest feature in 3PAR. 3PAR is very usable with thin volume because it detects zeros while writing. Every time I tell the hypervisor to make the full provisioning, it makes the volume as simple provisioning in 3PAR, not full provisioning.”

    Symmetrix VMAX accelerate your transformation to the software-defined data center with the world's most powerful, trusted, and smart family of storage products.
    Sample Customers
    Hanergy Global Solar PV Application Pte Ltd
    Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC
    Wentworth-Douglas Hospital, Kindred Healthcare, Cosentry, Sumitomo Life Insurance Company, Shriners, BZWBK
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization81%
    Computer Software Company3%
    Manufacturing Company2%
    Government2%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Healthcare Company23%
    Government8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise84%
    Large Enterprise11%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Frame-Based Disk Arrays
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Vantara, IBM, Dell Technologies and others in Frame-Based Disk Arrays. Updated: March 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.