We performed a comparison between HiT Software DBMoto and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."DBMoto was very simple to set up and move our tables to the Oracle DB."
"The most valuable features are that is easy to install and it is user-friendly."
"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."
"Pricing is an area that needs improvement."
"This product would be improved with additional built-in functions for simpler date conversion, as well as for data type transformations."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
"It is quite expensive."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"For code version control, you need to use some external software."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
HiT Software DBMoto is ranked 17th in Data Replication while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. HiT Software DBMoto is rated 9.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HiT Software DBMoto writes "Replication monitor feature is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". HiT Software DBMoto is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Syniti Data Replication and E2E Bridge, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.