We performed a comparison between Heimdal Email Security and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."It is stable and reliable."
"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."
"It's a very good product for compliance and transaction monitoring for anti-money laundering."
"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."
"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."
"The alerts are the most valuable feature because we have different alerts. Different data is fed to Actimize. It alerts us if a transaction happened from a certain place."
"It's a very good case management system."
"The solution could be less expensive."
"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."
"Licensing costs are high compared to other products in the market."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
"Its user interface could be better."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"This solution is unnecessarily complex."
"Processes don't function when front end is down."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Heimdal Email Security is ranked 13th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews. Heimdal Email Security is rated 9.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Heimdal Email Security writes "Straightforward to set up, reliable, and offers good functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". Heimdal Email Security is most compared with , whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and ThreatMetrix.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.