We performed a comparison between Gurucul UEBA and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment."
"The most valuable feature of Gurucul is the ability to customize and it is on the Hadoop platform that has a lot of flexibility."
"I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS."
"InsightVM's best features are the vulnerability database and remediation steps."
"It's very scalable."
"One of the most valuable features is it's graphical dashboard feature. It is quite easy to manage the widgets, and we can customize those according to our queries."
"This solution is much more user-friendly than past solutions I have used."
"The solution is automatically scheduled so it runs by itself."
"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."
"The most valuable features of Rapid7 InsightVM are the accurate level of scanning and the workflows are good."
"When you connect any new device to the network, Rapid7 has the ability to detect the new device immediately. It can scan that device to detect if it has any vulnerability. It tells you what is vulnerable and what has been misconfigured. It also tells you what is the risk of that misconfiguration or lack of patches and how to resolve the problem."
"It could be more stable."
"Gurucul can improve on the online documentation. They should educate the end users more to allow them to do everything themselves."
"Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system."
"The on-premise updates could improve from Rapid7 InsightVM."
"It would be nice to have an additional feature that would provide reports on who has logged onto the console or who did what on the console."
"Technical support does not respond quickly."
"A definite improvement would be to make it easier to run ad-hoc scans without needing to assign the asset to a site or group."
"Their customer support should be improved, and the effectiveness of scans also needs to be improved."
"The product does not have the capability to do dynamic scanning of non-web applications."
"There have been instances where technical support takes a long time to update the status of a ticket, which is something that can be improved."
"In order to be able to properly test the solution and make a decision, I would like to receive the test license code instantly and eliminate the wait time."
Gurucul UEBA is ranked 11th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 3 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Gurucul UEBA is rated 6.6, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Gurucul UEBA writes "Helped reduce our operational costs and increase our efficiency, but it can be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Gurucul UEBA is most compared with Exabeam Fusion SIEM, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Wazuh, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightIDR.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.