We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."
"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."
"Scalability is the best feature of the solution."
"The ability to automate Splunk SOAR and customize the playbook use cases is the most valuable feature and is very exciting for me."
"The solution allows us to customize playbooks and incorporate custom code, allowing us to drag and drop elements while still writing code to build the integrations we need."
"It's pretty easy when it comes to setting up assets. If you want to fetch emails or call a REST API, you can set up an asset and grab that information."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR that stands out is it has a great SOAR. The automation and orchestration module is highly mature. A lot of use cases are on user entity and behavioral analytics (UEBA), which is artificial intelligence and machine learning-based (AIML)."
"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."
"The solution’s dashboard is really good and customizable. It also has a good UI."
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."
"The UI can be more customizable for the clients."
"There is a lot of room for improvement with the UI."
"The number of playbooks on offer should be increased."
"We've had trouble implementing the solution with Microsoft products. There seems to be an integration gap."
"The cost of Splunk SOAR has room for improvement."
"Splunk SOAR should improve its ease of upgrade, which is a pain point for us right now."
"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."
"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."
Earn 20 points
Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 30 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cortex XSIAM, ServiceNow Security Operations, Torq and Swimlane.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
