We performed a comparison between Enterasys Ethernet Switches [EOL] and NETGEAR Switches based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Ubiquiti Networks and others in Ethernet Switches."This is a big telco switch with six slots."
"Enterasys Ethernet Switches are stable."
"The product is easy to deploy."
"It's nice, if there is an issue, to be able to go in through the remote. The fact that the remote doesn't require a static IP... is nice. They initiate the contact to the outside world, without requiring a static to get in."
"The tool is very easy to deploy as it is a very basic switch."
"One of the biggest benefits of the remote management is that it's easy to use and you can use it from a mobile device or tablet with the app they've developed... If one of my engineers is out in the field at a client and an alert comes in from another client, that engineer can take that alert and look at it in real-time."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use."
"The solution helps transfer data."
"The most valuable feature is definitely the fully functional IGMP snooping and querier, out-of-the-box, that the switch provides. With most if not all switches that we've worked with previously, at a minimum you have to enable a couple of different options... It's really a good feature to have that stuff enabled and fully functional out-of-the-box so that [AV techs] don't have to worry about configuring any of that stuff."
"For what I used this switch for, it did well."
"Enterasys could provide better support, needs an improved user interface and improved performance."
"The initial setup could be made simpler."
"Support needs to be improved."
"This product lacks a CLI interface."
"Netgear switches could be cheaper."
"If they could come up with ways to look at metrics on it while the video is capping through the system, that would be nice. There could be some interesting uses for that, but it's a long way off."
"There is a lack of documentation, and the documentation I have is unclear, so I have to rely on Google for information."
"There are some design issues on which they really missed the boat. The problem has to do with rack mounting them because the lights and jacks should all be on the front, and the power on the back. The way they did it makes it really difficult to use them in a rack environment, because when the lights are on the opposite side of the jacks... you usually can't see the back side of a rack. You can't get back there to see, so it's just crazy."
"The M4250 switches needs more SFP models."
"The IGMP specifics of the web management console could use a bit of clarification."
More Enterasys Ethernet Switches [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Enterasys Ethernet Switches [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Ethernet Switches while NETGEAR Switches is ranked 4th in Ethernet Switches with 50 reviews. Enterasys Ethernet Switches [EOL] is rated 7.0, while NETGEAR Switches is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Enterasys Ethernet Switches [EOL] writes "Good for networking large buildings, but there are problems with failing parts and the price should be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NETGEAR Switches writes "You can stack different models of switches which makes the scalability great". Enterasys Ethernet Switches [EOL] is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, whereas NETGEAR Switches is most compared with D-Link Ethernet Switches, Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, Cisco Ethernet Switches and MikroTik Routers and Switches.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.