We performed a comparison between Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools."The pricing is reasonable."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to catch content from website."
"I like its simplicity."
"All the features in Selenium to automate the UI."
"Ability to integrate with every other tool."
"Selenium WebDriver and Selenium IDE are useful."
"The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations."
"I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support."
"Selenium is the fastest tool compared to other competitors. It can run on any language, like Java, Python, C++, and .NET. So we can test any application on Selenium, whether it's mobile or desktop."
"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."
"Technical support isn't very good. Sometimes their recommendations were not very clear."
"We'd like to see some more image management in future releases."
"Handling frames and windows needs to be improved."
"When we upgrade the version, some features are missing. I want the product to include some AI capabilities."
"I would like to see some reporting or test management tools."
"Katalon has built a UI on top of Selenium to make it more user-friendly, as well as repository options and the ability to create repositories for objects, among other things. It would be helpful if this type of information could be included in the Selenium tool itself, so people wouldn't have to do filing testing."
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
"They should leverage the tools for supporting Windows apps."
More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is ranked 16th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is rated 9.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing writes "User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is most compared with Apache JMeter, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.