We performed a comparison between Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."We have 20,000 endpoints in our organization. It's very critical to monitor each and every device with any of our solutions. By deploying Cybereason, it collects all the information from every computer and it will feed it to the AI engine and do a malware check. It's very clear cut and we save a lot of time. It detects the problem very quickly and we can prevent an issue before it occurs."
"The most valuable features of Splunk SOAR are the easy integration with other solutions, including other Splunk solutions. The most important playbooks we need on the market come already on the Frontend. However, nowadays, Splunk changed its name, it's not Frontend anymore, it's Splunk Store. This is a very strong point."
"The ability to automate Splunk SOAR and customize the playbook use cases is the most valuable feature and is very exciting for me."
"Very flexible integration with other tools"
"It's pretty easy when it comes to setting up assets. If you want to fetch emails or call a REST API, you can set up an asset and grab that information."
"I have found all the security automation platform features of Splunk SOAR to be good. The Automation playbook development is highly useful."
"So far, the interface is very easy to use."
"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."
"It helps increase efficiency and productivity."
"It's all on the analysis part. They currently support from email only. If we have a problem with Cybereason like high memory utilization, for example, we send an email to their team and they respond when they see it, but there is no on-call support. They don't offer the ability to call them."
"The Splunk SOAR platform was not designed specifically for case management which is why this area needs improvement."
"What we have seen is if the workflow gets halted or if we want to halt a workflow, it cannot be resumed."
"We've had trouble implementing the solution with Microsoft products. There seems to be an integration gap."
"I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also very expensive for my region."
"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."
"Splunk SOAR has room to improve its offering for small-sized customers. The price is not fair for smaller-sized customers."
"The technical support for the Splunk SIEM solution was average."
"And most of the challenges that I have faced with the solution can be found in the documentation itself."
Earn 20 points
Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Incident Response while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 30 reviews. Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] writes "Detects a problem very quickly and enables us to prevent an issue before it occurs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". Cybereason Deep Respond [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cortex XSIAM, ServiceNow Security Operations, Torq and Swimlane.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
