We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Panda Adaptive Defense 360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"I like that you can remove the admin rights from the user's computer and have control over the environment. That means you can delete the local admins and grant them proper privileges with the console. So, they will get proper permissions for applications they need, but we don't have to do it. In the domain where we don't have control, the user can only do specified actions, but not all of them."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The patch management module is very important."
"It allows us to stop activation windows."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."
"The most valuable feature of Panda Security Adaptive Defense is we don't have to have dedicated infrastructure on-premise because it is cloud-based."
"The most valuable features of Panda Security Adaptive Defense are the useful hardware information it provides, light on resources, controllable from the console, remote scan functionality, and the blocking of a lot of URL malware."
"Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it."
"The protection from malware is the most important feature. It has some endpoint information about the vehicle of the virus, malware, etc. It is also stable and easy to install, and they also provide good technical support."
"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
"We do get the odd false positive when we're trying to install the software."
"Their MacOS support isn't that good."
"The solution should have additional endpoint protection."
"t would help if it would monitor the network better."
"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."
"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."
"They could have more reports."
"It needs improvements in its EDR and its ability to manage all the nodes. I'd like better communication between the console and the nodes, so I don't have to remote into each individual machine that's having an issue with the protection."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 27 reviews while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is ranked 22nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 25 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 writes "Managing multiple machines is a pain, but support is top notch". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
