We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Malwarebytes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The product is stable."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."
"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."
"The solution is scalable."
"The solution is very good at scanning."
"We have seen a decrease of approximately ninety percent in the number of events."
"Provides successful ransomware shut down operations."
"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."
"The pricing of the product is very good."
"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the EDR and the complete feature set provided."
"Malwarebytes is a comprehensive solution for keeping endpoints safe and secure from intruders, viruses, malware and so on."
"The installation process is very easy, especially since it is on the cloud."
"The solution is very expensive."
"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"They need much better integration with Azure AD."
"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the way it is deployed, in terms of being able to distribute it. Right now we have to get our hands on a machine to deploy it. It would be nice if there was an easier system."
"It's not good in search hunting."
"I would like to see integration with other vendors going forward."
"Strictly in terms of cyber security, the release cycle should be quarterly, at most. It shouldn't be more frequent than that because, for one thing, keeping up with tech support is difficult."
"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."
"I would like to see a little more detail in the log. So, when an event occurs, I'd like to know not just when it happened and on what device, but what activity was taking place on the machine at the time so that we can drill down. If we get a false positive, we have to do a lot of research and go back and forth with our end-users to know why it was a false positive. So, having a little more detail around detections and events would probably be my most asked feature."
"Every once in a while, it gets clobbered by updates from other places. I don't think this should happen."
"The product update capability needs to be improved."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while Malwarebytes is ranked 28th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 33 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Malwarebytes is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Malwarebytes writes "Intuitive, easy to use, and does a good job of catching and stopping things for the most part and has a unique rollback feature". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Malwarebytes is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, HP Wolf Security and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Malwarebytes report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
