We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"The Oracle integration tool is the most comfortable tool for using those Oracle products."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"If an inbound file is larger than one GB, it cannot be transformed within Oracle."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"They should provide tutorials for beginners to learn about the processes."
"The bulk processing needs improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Talend Open Studio and SSIS, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.