We performed a comparison between Cisco Prime and OpenText Network Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The most valuable features of Cisco Prime include its comprehensive functionality as a one-stop solution for basic SNMP port management."
"Enables oversight in order to tweak and tune."
"We use this solution to troubleshoot our wireless systems, specifically regarding signal strength."
"The endpoint information Cisco Prime generates helps us troubleshoot, and it's also useful for compliance reporting and endpoint identification."
"The hardware Cisco provides is excellent. It's a well-made product."
"The solution helps with the management and support of the enterprise network."
"The dashboard is a valuable feature. It's very clear, and the metrics make it easy to see the current network situation."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
"If you think about a centralized monitoring system, Cisco Prime is not good because it does not support third-party vendors like Palo Alto or FortiGate."
"Cisco Prime could improve the graphical user interface."
"Cisco Prime could improve the notifications in the system. Having more details about what is happening would be useful, such as traffic numbers or who is connected. We can see them through the firewall controller, but it would be better if you can see them from one place."
"Cisco Prime needs to have lower prices and more customization options."
"The reporting could be simplified and the information made clearer to the user."
"They could consider offering more flexible pricing options for their customers."
"Cisco needs to improve Prime's monitoring tab. If any device goes down, there is a 15-second lapse before we know. It would be much better if we were alerted two or three minutes before a device is about to fail, so we can dispatch a field engineer and avoid network downtime. I would like to see a feature that allows you to access the devices directly from Prime's monitoring tab. That would make work easier for us."
"It should be able to monitor Palo Alto, Juniper, and Check Point products - not just Cisco solutions."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
More OpenText Network Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Prime is ranked 2nd in Network Management Applications with 35 reviews while OpenText Network Operations Management is ranked 11th in Network Management Applications with 2 reviews. Cisco Prime is rated 7.8, while OpenText Network Operations Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Prime writes "Robust, cost-effective, and provides good visibility, but the scalability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Operations Management writes "Good integration capabilities, good reliability, and is user-friendly". Cisco Prime is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, Aruba Airwave, Huawei eSight and Fortinet FortiManager, whereas OpenText Network Operations Management is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
