We performed a comparison between Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] and Portnox CORE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC).Earn 20 points
Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Access Control (NAC) while Portnox CORE is ranked 11th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 14 reviews. Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] writes "Helps by tracking port VLAN configurations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices". Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Portnox Clear.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.