We compared Check Point Remote Access VPN and Netgate TNSR across several parameters based on our user's reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Initial Setup: User feedback on the establishment duration of Check Point and Netgate indicated varying timeframes. While some users spent three months on deployment and a week on setup for both solutions, others needed only a week for both stages.
Features: Check Point is known for its ease of use and efficient management capabilities. Users praise Netgate for its high performance, exceptional scalability, and advanced security features.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Check Point can vary depending on specific requirements and network infrastructure, while users have found the setup cost for Netgate to be straightforward. Both products offer flexible licensing options tailored to different business needs. Check Point has been praised for its significant ROI, as users have reported positive outcomes and benefits. Netgate also received positive ROI feedback, highlighting its value and profitability.
Customer Service: Check Point has been lauded for exceptional customer service, praised for prompt and helpful assistance, extensive knowledge, and expertise. Netgate is highly praised for excellent assistance, prompt responses, reliable and supportive customer service.
Comparison Results: Users have praised Check Point for its user-friendly interface and prompt assistance, highlighting its robust security measures and reliable connectivity, the pricing, licensing options, and positive returns on investment. Netgate TNSR offers high performance capabilities and exceptional scalability.
"It allows everyone to work from home. If no one could work from home, then we wouldn't have a company, especially now during COVID-19. It's mission-critical, especially since it's currently being used. If there is a problem with it, we would really be screwed. We would be hard-pressed because we would have to figure out what solution we're going to go with, how to deploy it, how long it would take to deploy it, and how we'd even get it on people's computers if we couldn't VPN to them. It would be near impossible to just change to a new VPN solution right now."
"The tool is easy to configure and use. We integrated it with Active Directory to manage user authentication. It's intuitive and transparent, making it simple for users to use. It connects automatically to the VPN whenever users turn on the laptop. The product is efficient and offers centralized control."
"I like the fact that Remote Access allows the administrator to control and manage things. It makes things smoother, and it has been an excellent experience."
"The solution is easy for administrators because you can check logs and write rules on the same page."
"One of the features that I like most about this software is that it has a very intuitive, simple, and versatile interface that makes it easy to use and configure."
"The initial set up is not complex."
"The policies are easy to use."
"We can integrate remote access to our branches through Check Point services."
"The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"This is the best version we are using, however, if some changes can be made in the next release, I'd like to see adjustments to the time period and internet connectivity."
"We would like to implement HTML5 (clientless access) in the product without installing any additional software."
"The fully-featured security module is only supported on Windows and Mac systems, which means that organizations with Linux will face issues providing secure access."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"The Linux version may have an app (similar to Windows) instead of a shell script."
"Some configurations, like idle timeout (the requirement came from multiple users), are not possible to configure directly from the Check Point management server."
"When you need to create something, you have to follow many steps and I think that should be simplified."
"We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews while Netgate TNSR is ranked 22nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Netgate TNSR is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netgate TNSR writes "Good gateway with helpful traffic shaping and load balancing". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas Netgate TNSR is most compared with MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, Cisco Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches and Juniper MX Series Routers.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
