We performed a comparison between Cassandra, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"The technical evaluation is very good."
"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"A consistent solution."
"I am satisfied with the performance."
"The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time updates is paramount."
"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."
"I don't see any performance issues."
"Very good end-to-end security features."
"With a cluster available, you can manage the security layer using the shared SDX - it provides flexibility."
"Provides a viable open-source solution for enterprise implementations and reliable, intelligent data analysis."
"The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."
"It has the best proxy, security, and support features compared to open-source products."
"The product is completely secure."
"The data science aspect of the solution is valuable."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."
"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."
"Cassandra could be more user-friendly like MongoDB."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"Interface is not user friendly."
"The solution is limited to a linear performance."
"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult."
"It could be faster and more user-friendly."
"I would like to see an improvement in how the solution helps me to handle the whole cluster."
"The user infrastructure and user interface needs to be improved, as well as the performance. The GUI needs to be better."
"The competitors provide better functionalities."
"The areas of improvement depend on the scale of the project. For banking customers, security features and an essential budget for commercial licenses would be the top priority. Data regulation could be the most crucial for a project with extensive data or an extra use case."
"The one thing that we struggled with predominately was support. Because it was relatively new, support was always a big issue and I think it's still a bit of an ongoing concern with the team currently managing it."
"The governance aspect of the solution should be improved."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
