We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and TIBCO Cloud Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"It has been a stable product."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"The deployment was rather complicated."
"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."
"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while TIBCO Cloud Integration is ranked 17th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 3 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while TIBCO Cloud Integration is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Cloud Integration writes "A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas TIBCO Cloud Integration is most compared with Azure Data Factory, SAP Process Orchestration, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Oracle Integration Cloud Service. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
