We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Flowgear based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."
"Great for data flow."
"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."
"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."
"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."
"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."
"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"Documentation could be improved."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"The UI could be improved."
"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."
"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."
"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."
"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."
"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."
"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Flowgear is ranked 10th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Flowgear is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Flowgear writes "Great features, effortless integrations and offers an enhanced experience for users". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Azure Data Factory, whereas Flowgear is most compared with . See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Flowgear report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
