We performed a comparison between Basis Testimony and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."It takes less time to complete the regression testing."
"The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is picking up and entering values from web pages."
"It supports multiple processes, which is great."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to catch content from website."
"It is very stable."
"The grids, as well as the selectors, are the most valuable features."
"Selenium HQ has a lot of capabilities and is compatible with many languages."
"It's not too complicated to implement."
"The GUI and design could be improved."
"Selenium HQ doesn't have any self-healing capabilities."
"Selenium HQ can improve the authorization login using OTP, it is not able to be done in this solution."
"It takes such a long time to use this solution that it may be worth looking into other free solutions such as TestProject or Katalon Studio, or paid solutions to replace it."
"There are stability issues with Internet Explorer only."
"I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack."
"We can only use Selenium HQ for desktop applications which would be helpful. We are only able to do online based applications."
"Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
Earn 20 points
Basis Testimony is ranked 17th in Regression Testing Tools while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Basis Testimony is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Basis Testimony writes "User-friendly regression testing that is fast and offers good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Basis Testimony is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.