We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring and Instabug based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile APM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its GUI."
"In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool identified an issue within the mobile app, causing lost transactions in the billing system."
"Whenever the application crashes from user behavior, we can easily simulate the error. We are happy with this feature and find it to be valuable."
"There are many features that are very valuable to us, but the ability to monitor the status of the users' experience in real-time is one of them."
"For anybody who is looking into enhancing or improving their application code quality, I would definitely recommend this solution."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
"The product makes it very easy to reproduce issues."
"I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now."
"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."
"There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java."
"The way the agentless monitoring and agent monitoring get used is to be decided by the user, but there is no clarification on the setup phase or on how and why to use the aforementioned options."
"In terms of improvements we would like to see, we want to understand what the battery consumption metrics are whenever a user is viewing. It would be really helpful for us if we could get those details levels."
"I would like to see a better way to automate actions based on the events generated by the tool."
"It would be beneficial if the tool could be more precise in capturing steps, focusing only on the relevant ones. For example, there were some times when it caught some extra screenshots which were not included in the steps. Sometimes, it also happened that it got some extra steps that were not in there to reproduce the bug. We also called that screenshot and the steps there as well."
"The end users were not able to report bugs."
More AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is ranked 5th in Mobile APM with 6 reviews while Instabug is ranked 7th in Mobile APM with 2 reviews. AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2, while Instabug is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring writes "Offers insights into peak usage hours, the application's status, and that of secondary services, such as databases and APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Instabug writes "A stable solution that provides visibility into user journeys and enables the filing of RCA reports". AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is most compared with , whereas Instabug is most compared with . See our AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring vs. Instabug report.
See our list of best Mobile APM vendors.
We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
