Instabug vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Instabug and Splunk are both solutions in the Mobile APM category. Instabug is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while Splunk is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Instabug holds a 0.7% mindshare in MA, compared to Splunk’s 27.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Instabug users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Instabug

Read 2 Instabug reviews

142 Views
142 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 252 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

12,248 Views
2,940 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Instabug

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 17, 2025

Splunk AppDynamics, Instabug, and Splunk are competing products in performance monitoring and application management. Splunk AppDynamics appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive APM capabilities and robust analytics, while Instabug is noteworthy for its specialized focus on mobile applications.

Features: Splunk AppDynamics provides real-time performance monitoring, infrastructure visualization, and automated problem detection. Instabug offers in-depth bug reporting, user feedback collection, and real-time crash reporting for mobile applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk AppDynamics uses a traditional deployment model with extensive professional support, making it beneficial for large-scale enterprise environments. Instabug features a simpler integration process for mobile applications and offers agile support tailored to rapid iteration cycles, appealing to smaller teams.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk AppDynamics involves a significant initial setup cost but generally delivers a strong ROI for complex environments needing comprehensive APM solutions. Instabug has higher upfront pricing, but its ROI is significant for mobile-focused teams leveraging its features for enhanced user experience and quality, which can justify the cost through improved customer satisfaction and retention.

To learn more, read our detailed Instabug vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Instabug vs. Splunk AppDynamics

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Instabug

Ranking in Mobile APM

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Ranking in Mobile APM

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

252

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Container Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Mobile APM category, the mindshare of Instabug is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 27.4%, up from 25.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile APM Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk AppDynamics	27.4%
Instabug	0.7%
Other	71.9%

Mobile APM

Featured Reviews

Aisha Mazher

Senior Semi Automation Engineer at Venturedive

A stable solution that provides visibility into user journeys and enables the filing of RCA reports

The initial setup was really easy. There were some calls that we had to integrate into our code. Instabug was easy to integrate with our app. If we needed special logs for some calls to check the response rate of some end-to-end procedures, we could also integrate them. There were some APIs we could use for end-to-end integration. The product was deployed on Bitbucket. The beta app was deployed in our local environment. The deployment process was not time-consuming. The production phase took a day. It was just a one-time effort. For the beta app, we had to do it multiple times, but it was easy to deploy.

Read full review

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Application performance management and error resolution improved with data-driven insights

Dynatrace has multiple functions compared to Splunk AppDynamics, so Splunk AppDynamics should add those functions, which are not available as of now. Dynatrace has a universal agent that collects all information related to their CI, and if one CI has multiple languages, then there is no need to instrument multiple agents. However, Splunk AppDynamics requires multiple agents; if I have one server with multiple applications in different languages, then I need to instrument different agents for each application. Splunk AppDynamics should work with Dynatrace with one single universal agent that works with all application languages, eliminating the need for multiple implementations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."

"The product makes it very easy to reproduce issues."

"It is a stable solution that helps address user issues well."

"AppDynamics provides us with detailed information about the performance of the underlying infrastructure, including servers, databases, and external services."

"It gives me the ability to trace logs between transactions, for example, a DB transaction or JVM transaction from one hub to the other. I can easily find out where the problem is or where the bottleneck of the issues lies."

"Has helped us to increase customer acquisitions and reduce revenue leakage."

"The ability to identify the top running queries has been extremely valuable for us."

"It's good for a larger scale deployment such as what my company is working on."

"It reduces the time to resolve issues and requires less manpower."

"In 2014 and 2015, AppDynamics was one of the best products on the market."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"The end users were not able to report bugs."

"It would be beneficial if the tool could be more precise in capturing steps, focusing only on the relevant ones. For example, there were some times when it caught some extra screenshots which were not included in the steps. Sometimes, it also happened that it got some extra steps that were not in there to reproduce the bug. We also called that screenshot and the steps there as well."

"AppDynamics Server Monitoring has room for improvement in terms of pricing. If the price could be cheaper, it would be great for both the customer and the integrator. What I'd like to see in the next release of AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a better dashboard for the customer. The dashboard should be more interactive."

"AppDynamics Database Monitoring would be improved with more support for microservices architecture."

"The user experience is quite confusing. There are too many different development stages. The UI is not very intuitive."

"If you have a single URL and all the operations are coming in as part of the header, you will not be able to segregate them for different actions."

"The scalability could be improved."

"AppDynamics could benefit from greater integration with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning."

"I am not very impressed with support. The service could be better."

"The UI could use a little help."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of AppDynamics could be reduced in my region."

"The cost is prohibitive."

"The pricing for AppDynamics Server Monitoring in Africa and the Middle East is too expensive, so it's very hard to sell it to customers. If there could be different pricing or package for the region, that would be great. My company pays for the license of AppDynamics Server Monitoring on a per-agent, per-server basis. It's $700 to $1000 per server, and it's paid annually. My company is on a subscription model for the solution. On a scale of one to five, where one is expensive and five is cheap, my rating for the price of AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a two."

"The pricing model for AppDynamics could be better. You have to subscribe to a yearly or a three-year licensing, which isn't very handy. The solution is one of the most expensive in the market today."

"I would like more flexible pricing: A pay-per-use model, rather than just a fixed-price model."

"AppDynamics is priced on the higher side."

"There is an annual cost for the use of this solution."

"Take into consideration what you get for specific pricing models and how much it costs to add on things you may need later."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile APM solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	188

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Instabug?

The product makes it very easy to reproduce issues.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Instabug?

The end users were not able to report bugs. We had to depend only upon the crash reports. For example, if an application was not crashing, but a specific functionality was not working, the QA perso...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Instabug?

I used the solution to perform RCA for my app. I used to review the crash reports every week and check which API or call was failing repeatedly. I created a debugging configuration in Jira and repo...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit

Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppDynamics?

The solution saves time and cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 14% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile APM

August 2025

Download Instabug product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

August 2025

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Overview

Instabug is a tool used for bug tracking and reporting in mobile apps, enabling teams to capture issues directly from users with detailed error logs, screenshots, and steps to reproduce for efficient bug fixing.

Instabug is essential for bug tracking and reporting within mobile applications. Teams can capture issues directly from users, helping developers identify and address bugs swiftly. In addition, Instabug facilitates beta testing and gathering user feedback, streamlining the development process and enabling quick resolution of issues. The tool offers detailed error logs, screenshots, and steps to reproduce issues, making it easier for developers to pinpoint and fix problems.

What are Instabug's key features?

Easy integration: Quickly add Instabug to any mobile app with minimal setup.
Comprehensive bug tracking: Capture detailed error logs, screenshots, and steps to reproduce issues.
Efficient crash reporting: Gain insights into app crashes with complete reports.
In-app feedback: Collect user feedback directly within the app.
Session replay: Replay user sessions to understand the context of issues.
Robust analytics: Analyze data to improve app performance and user experience.
Customizable workflows: Tailor workflows to fit team processes.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Improved issue resolution: Faster identification and fixing of bugs.
Enhanced communication: Streamlined communication between developers and testers.
Increased efficiency: Reduction in time spent on debugging and issue reporting.
Better user experience: Swift addressing of user-reported issues enhances overall satisfaction.

Instabug is implemented in various industries for tasks like mobile app development, beta testing, and user feedback collection. Development teams rely on it for capturing comprehensive bug reports and detailed error logs, facilitating smoother workflows. Companies in tech, finance, retail, and healthcare sectors integrate Instabug to enhance app performance and user satisfaction through efficient bug tracking and feedback systems.

Instabug

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?

Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.

How does AppDynamics benefit users?

Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

Instabug vs. Splunk AppDynamics

September 2025

Free Report: Instabug vs. Splunk AppDynamics

Find out what your peers are saying about Instabug vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Instabug vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

See our list of best Mobile APM vendors.

We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.