We performed a comparison between Alteryx Designer and CloverDX Designer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Alteryx Designer's user interface is great, as it is very user-friendly."
"It has an easy setup process."
"We use Alteryx Designer for analytics. It's quite helpful because once we set it up, we don't have to manually update or process data repeatedly. It saves time, especially for financial reporting, which is typically done monthly or quarterly. Once we set it up initially, we only need to make occasional updates if necessary."
"Alteryx Designer is stable."
"Alteryx is quite easy to use, learn, and understand as a product."
"For my daily analytics needs, the entire Alteryx Designer platform is beneficial."
"I believe in the ability to connect to multiple data sources, as well as the ease of use to transform data and output data in a variety of formats."
"Alteryx Designer is easier to use for machine learning models. However, I am not very good at Python scripts which you will need to make the machine learning scripts."
"Its simplicity and the way it handles graphs are the most valuable features."
"The price of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"If the price were reduced then it would be more competitive."
"Its cost can sometimes be a drawback."
"Alteryx needs to improve its web governance. The gallery you use to filter the data is something else that could use some work. For instance, if you have a report connected to a database and want to filter a specific user, you should be able to suggest a specific region or a particular year. I know that the Alteryx isn't designed for data governance, but that would be great to think about."
"Sometimes, while getting data from a third-party product, the solution works slowly."
"Alteryx's data science and machine learning capabilities are where it loses out to DataIQ."
"Alteryx Designer's pricing and support could be improved."
"An improvement for Alteryx Designer would be faster bug fixes and updates."
"If I could give any advice to the guys who are developing it, I would suggest them to really look at the enterprise features, such as being able to log what's going on, being able to capture the current state of processing, and being able to recover from error situations. So, there should be a focus on logging, recoverability, and monitoring. We should be able to monitor what's going on, and in case of any issues, we should be able to recover and restart processing and other things. For scalability and performance, I would probably suggest the Pushdown feature so that you can do the transformation directly on the data source. You do not need to do that calculation within the ETL server. For this, you should be aware of the type of data because each database or kind of storage, such as Hadoop, has its own ANSI standard or language, such as SQL. Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM have their own language. Based on the feedback that I have got, its initial setup takes some time. It could perhaps be simpler."
Earn 20 points
Alteryx Designer is ranked 9th in Data Integration with 27 reviews while CloverDX Designer is ranked 68th in Data Integration. Alteryx Designer is rated 8.0, while CloverDX Designer is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Alteryx Designer writes "An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloverDX Designer writes "Simple, stable, and allows us to handle data from various sources, but needs enterprise features for logging, recoverability, and monitoring". Alteryx Designer is most compared with Azure Data Factory, FME, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Palantir Foundry, whereas CloverDX Designer is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.