We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] and Microsoft Azure App Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms."I have found Adobe Experience Manager Mobile to be reliable."
"I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool."
"One of our reasons to use the product is its cloud service. Our usage is mainly on the cloud and we like the benefits that we can get from the cloud. You can easily do the literal shift of your application easily. You can jump into the cloud very quickly."
"The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server. This makes the application readily accessible, and the response time will be much better."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure App Service are its vertical and horizontal scaling, along with its ability to throw a docker image."
"The product is scalable."
"Azure data factory is a good tool."
"One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process."
"The feature I find most valuable is the 'Diagnose and Solve problem' function. This not only allows us to fix a problem, but also to generate analytics on why the issue occurred."
"The stability of Microsoft Azure App Service is good."
"Adobe Experience Manager Mobile could be improved by making it much easier to share the design system between different projects."
"The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution."
"Can be improved by increasing the number of data centres worldwide."
"I would like to see some significant improvement in the technical support provision for this solution."
"Microsoft Azure App Service needs some improvement in the scaling area."
"It would be fantastic if Microsoft morphed after my exit service, removing it from subscriptions and moving it to different regions, especially for that service."
"Microsoft Azure App Service could improve by having better integration and connectivity with other platforms. The solution has good integration with other large companies' solutions but there are smaller service platforms companies where there could be integrated better."
"The configuration is slow without understanding the systematic process."
"Lacking somewhat in template data flows."
"Customers love it when a solution is affordable, but with Microsoft Azure App Service, you can start and stop it, and when you stop it, it won't be reachable and it won't be available, yet you're still being charged for it. You'll still be charged even if the solution isn't accessible because Microsoft Azure App Service runs on a shared virtual machine that keeps on running, so if there's a way to work this out, it'll be a great improvement to only pay for what you use. The solution should have no hidden cost and no extra charge when it's stopped. This is what needs improvement in Microsoft Azure App Service."
More Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 5th in Mobile Development Platforms with 38 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] writes "Fulfills all the requirements of a CMS tool and is stable and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "A solution with great server management and helps improve performance". Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Pega BPM and Appian.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.