Mean time to isolate a problem has dropped by 50-75% in each region since we've deployed the Riverbed SteelCentral suite. We're also able to isolate further at first look and select the correct resources to continue troubleshooting.
Senior Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We use it to see the experience of users hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc.
Pros and Cons
- "Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc."
- "Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."
How has it helped my organization?
What is most valuable?
- Transaction Trace Warehouse (TTW) which records all transactions all the time, and lets us see performance down to the line of code.
- Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc.
What needs improvement?
Ability to trace transactions though non .Net/Java Layers has recently been added, but it's still dependent on a separate, traceable, unique ID.
Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have had no issues with the stability.
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
June 2025

Find out what your peers are saying about Riverbed, Splunk, Dynatrace and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In v8, the Dashboard and Browsermetrix products had issues with concurrent viewers. Riverbed supported us though modifications and incorporated a better design in v9.
How are customer service and support?
Support from our sales team and internal product owners at Riverbed has been exceptional. The call-in help desk team is just OK.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used and continue to use several traditional monitoring tools (SCOM), but we selected Riverbed for application performance monitoring, which grew to include network management and security use cases in the Riverbed ecosystem.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup was mostly very simple and has improved dramatically in v10. The slightly complex parts are around defining Java parameters and configuring Linux OS permissions.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did POC deployments of Riverbed, AppDynamics, and CA APM. About 20 others were cut at RFI/RFP.
What other advice do I have?
Your most immediate benefits will come from the ARX appliances, but the real rock star is TTW.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

Broadband CRM & Sales Operations Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
It provides automated dynamic discovery of applications and mapping of transaction flows.
Pros and Cons
- "Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive"
- "We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods."
How has it helped my organization?
We spend less time determining the root cause of problems. It became easy to find out responsible groups for problems. We can discover performance problems on pre-production environments before delivering in production. This way, we can increase customer satisfaction.
What is most valuable?
- Acceptable overhead on application
- 100% transactions not sampling
- Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive
- Automated dynamic discovery of applications and mapping of transaction flows
What needs improvement?
We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
- SQL performance problems: fast SQL execution but slow reading of the database. We solved these issues by increasing the fetch size in the code.
- Network problems: slow internet access by customers. There were CPU problems that couldn't be discovered by our Network Team.
- Backup problems: performance problems because of other systems which caused slow performance of this system.
- Database problems: performance problems between the database and storage but it told us it was an issue with the application.
- We had issues with the end-to-end view of unique customer: reviewing end- to-end customer problems to see where a problem is about customer, code, DB or network.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
There have been no issues scaling it for our needs.
How are customer service and technical support?
Support for issues when we need it is very good and professional in Turkey.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used HP Diagnostics, Wily and Introscope Agent. All these couldn't help diagnose problems on our network or with applications. Also, they use sample data.
How was the initial setup?
It's a bit complex to install and configure.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented it through a vendor team. The vendor has great experience which helps to make it a success.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did a PoC for AppDynamics, Dynatrace and Riverbed OPNET. Riverbed OPNET was more successful on technical support, better problem troubleshooting, and end-user monitoring.
What other advice do I have?
If you want to save time for problem resolution, and to address problem on your environments you should try Riverbed OPNET.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report and find out what your peers are saying about Riverbed, Splunk, Dynatrace, and more!
Updated: June 2025
Product Categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and ObservabilityPopular Comparisons
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
IDERA Precise
Correlsense SharePath
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report and find out what your peers are saying about Riverbed, Splunk, Dynatrace, and more!
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Comparison between AppInternals and Dynatrace.
- What is the main difference between SolarWinds NPM and Riverbed NetIM?
- When evaluating Application Performance Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
- What solution would you recommend for monitoring traffic utilization of leased lines?
- How Much Should I Budget for an APM Solution?
- Which is the best AANPM product? Should we be considering anything besides for Riverbed?
- Who Uses APM?
- What is your favorite tool for Application Performance Monitoring?
- How does synthetic monitoring differ from real user monitoring?