Share your experience using Kong Mesh

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Mehdi El Filahi - PeerSpot reviewer
Co-Founder at tenekit
Real User
Top 5
Useful for for small and quick load-balancing tasks
Pros and Cons
  • "What I like best about the product is its simplicity and speed. When you need to set up a load balancer quickly, HAProxy offers options like sticky sessions and round-robin. It's also fast to configure, including adding SSL for security. While it may have fewer options than other solutions like F5, HAProxy gets the job done for basic load-balancing tasks."
  • "Improving the documentation with multiple examples and scenarios would be beneficial. Most users encounter similar situations, so having a variety of scenarios readily available on the tool's website would be helpful. For instance, if I were part of the HAProxy team, I'd create a webpage with different scenarios and provide files for each scenario. This way, users wouldn't have to start from scratch every time."

What is our primary use case?

I use the tool mostly for small and quick load-balancing tasks. Additionally, I integrate it with Docker because the integration is quite fine.

What is most valuable?

What I like best about the product is its simplicity and speed. When you need to set up a load balancer quickly, HAProxy offers options like sticky sessions and round-robin. It's also fast to configure, including adding SSL for security. While it may have fewer options than other solutions like F5, HAProxy gets the job done for basic load-balancing tasks. 

The reliability features of HAProxy were particularly useful in a scenario where I needed to test load balancing between two Tomcats. Since these domains were inaccessible, I set up a third Docker with HAProxy, which had access to the Tomcat domains. I then configured HAProxy to handle the load balancing. This setup allowed the client to interact with HAProxy. 

The solution's integration with other elements is easy. 

What needs improvement?

Improving the documentation with multiple examples and scenarios would be beneficial. Most users encounter similar situations, so having a variety of scenarios readily available on the tool's website would be helpful. For instance, if I were part of the HAProxy team, I'd create a webpage with different scenarios and provide files for each scenario. This way, users wouldn't have to start from scratch every time. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for six years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I've only deployed a single instance and focused on monitoring it. 

How are customer service and support?

I haven't had direct experience with their technical support team. Whenever I encounter issues, I usually turn to Stack Overflow. I've found that other users often have similar problems, and I can usually find solutions there.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The tool is open-source. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten. It is good and famous. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Software Engineer at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Helps distribute the server load but has only the basic features
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is effective in managing our traffic."
  • "The product does not have any new technologies."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is used for high availability. We use it for the backend to distribute the load.

How has it helped my organization?

We needed a simple proxy system that is open source. HAProxy was the most used tool for any issues that we ran into. We did not want to use something that was not used much so that we could fix the issues that came up.

What is most valuable?

The solution is effective in managing our traffic. The integrations work fine. It's a load balancer. There's no need for complex integration. We hit it, and it balances the load in the servers that we assigned to it.

What needs improvement?

The product has the basic foundations of any load-balancing product. It is simple and basic. The product does not have any new technologies.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for a few years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The tool seems very stable. I have not heard of the infrastructure team having any issues with it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The tool is scalable. We have everything we need.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product is open source.

What other advice do I have?

There are better tools, but the product does the job well. All my colleagues know the tool and have used it. I recommend the product to others. Companies that have complex environments must not choose HAProxy. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate