Share your experience using ignio AIOps

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Rafael  Pinto Ferreira - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Impressive automation capabilities, predicts problems, and even find unseen vulnerabilities across your infrastructure
Pros and Cons
  • "BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps' predictive analytics positively impacted proactive problem-solving capabilities. It has been the most interesting part of the solution! It provides detailed analytics that gives you a deep understanding of your infrastructure and recurring issues/problems. It really predicts the problems."
  • "The biggest challenge is ensuring the customer has sufficient ITSM maturity to get the most out of the solution. BMC Helix is very sophisticated, and some clients lack that internal process maturity."

What is our primary use case?

We have clients like Yamaha, the motorcycle company. There's a project here in Brazil where they've adopted the full BMC ITSM suite, including operations management.

How has it helped my organization?

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps' predictive analytics positively impacted proactive problem-solving capabilities. It has been the most interesting part of the solution! It provides detailed analytics that gives you a deep understanding of your infrastructure and recurring issues/problems. It really predicts the problems. 

The real power is in the predictive capabilities. The AI and machine learning components get smarter over time, helping you anticipate problems.

BMC Helix really excels in pinpointing the root cause of problems quickly. Think of it as the "manager of managers." You likely have various monitoring tools like Zabbix, Dynatrace, Azure, etc., alongside CMs. BMC Helix gathers data from all of these sources, processes it, and continuously gets smarter through its AI.

It learns your infrastructure's baseline behavior. When something deviates from that baseline, it gathers more data from logs and other sources, compares everything, and can even predict something like a server failing in five days. Imagine it analyzes a complex cluster issue and suggests, "There's a 33% chance the root of this problem originates from this specific server or cluster."

It's incredibly intelligent and offers support, unlike anything I've seen for IT and infrastructure management.

What is most valuable?

There are good features around the visibility from discovery, operations management, and the AIOps capabilities – learning your infrastructure, predicting problems, and even finding unseen vulnerabilities. The AI Operations portion is the most valuable part of the whole BMC ITSM platform.

What needs improvement?

The biggest challenge is ensuring the customer has sufficient ITSM maturity to get the most out of the solution. BMC Helix is very sophisticated, and some clients lack that internal process maturity. There's sometimes a gap between the solution's capabilities and the client's readiness.

We have to bridge that gap, bringing the customer up to the level where they can fully use all the features and benefits. Otherwise, they're investing in a powerful tool they don't fully utilize.

It's crucial for vendors like us to assess client maturity before the project starts. We need to do the consulting work to show them the solution's potential and help them evaluate if it truly makes sense. Sometimes, the client might not be ready for the way BMC does things, for that level of automation and AI.

BMC's automation is like nothing I've seen. You can even deflect 30% of IT service desk tickets with an intelligent chatbot – that's a number from BMC. Imagine the reduction in human agents! It's a robot doing the work, but in a way that feels human... that's the impressive part. You can integrate with WhatsApp, Teams, etc. It's game-changing.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

ServiceNow doesn't have a free-scope module like BMC does. Also, their artificial intelligence isn't as good as BMC's. 

A big differentiator is BMC Business Workflow. You don't need many IT analyst developers for applications and integrations because we have drag-and-drop. Many pre-built components are available on the platform, including integration components. You can create applications by drag-and-drop. You don't need to write a line of code because we have a low-code/no-code module called Business Workflow. This allows you to develop operations and deliver applications without many IT workers.

With ServiceNow, customizations require many analysts. They don't have a low-code/no-code module, so you would need a team of engineers. In BMC, a business analyst could create applications because of our low-code/no-code tools.

In Brazil, we mainly see competition from Avanti, which I'm less familiar with, and ServiceNow. There are other players in the market, like TopDesk from the Netherlands. These solutions are cheaper, but they don't offer the same level of functionality as BMC, so many enterprise buyers avoid them.

I have also seen people who use solutions like Jira being used for ITSM, which I don't quite understand. Jira is a project management tool. So, customers who don't have growth plans, maybe they don't have maturity on ITSM software and think to use cheaper options. 

How was the initial setup?

Deployment depends on whether you choose the SaaS (Software as a Service) model or an on-premises installation. SaaS is much easier – BMC takes care of infrastructure, and you get a tenant, login, and password. It's ready to configure for your business.

An on-premises installation is more complex. You'll need in-house expertise in containers like Kubernetes or Docker, plus there's infrastructure planning involved. 

SaaS deployment is straightforward, the hard work is done by BMC.

But, on-premises installation is far more complex. You need container expertise, and the risk is higher. Frankly, most clients are opting for SaaS deployments these days. Only those with strict legal compliance requirements still choose on-premises, and that's increasingly rare.

What was our ROI?

Since the product helps the user predict problems, they proactively avoid faults that would otherwise stop your services. When a service is down, the user doesn't lose money. By predicting infrastructure issues and preventing downtime, the end user saves money. This translates to higher productivity than if the user didn't have BMC Helix Operations Management installed. You'll sell more thanks to increased availability and avoid the damage caused by unavailability.

The users will always be ahead of problems because they're predicting potential issues. That's the strongest argument for using Operations Management.

It's important to note that for maximum efficiency with BMC Helix platform, consider a larger implementation. While BMC Helix Discovery can be valuable on its own by providing infrastructure visibility, you'll get the full benefits I'm describing by combining it with modules like Operations Management, IT Service Management (ITSM), and others. This allows for continuous operations and brings all the advantages.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

BMC solution is cheaper than ServiceNow, our main competitor. So, I'd rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being expensive. 

The prices are lower than the competition because it's a BMC strategy to get a bigger market share. They're trying to regain some of the market they've lost to ServiceNow in the past.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Here in Brazil, BMC faces competition from ServiceNow and others. BMC is really evolving and differentiating itself from the others. BMC isn't focused on traditional ITSM processes like some competitors. They're focused on how BMC Operations Management can enable digital transformation for the entire enterprise.

This makes selling BMC a challenge here. IT management often doesn't want to hear about complex ITSM projects. They often see only the hard work of implementation, not the long-term benefits. BMC is trying to overcome that. They want to talk about digital transformation, not just granular ITSM features. I think they're making progress. I'm impressed with the direction of BMC Helix.

When you buy it for the whole enterprise, not just IT, the solution's cost scales very well. You can manage HR cases, legal cases, etc. This delivers integration and value beyond just IT issues. It helps the whole enterprise - that's the vision I see. 

I'm excited about BMC's future. With AIOps and machine learning, It's going to change how work is done by automating many manual tasks. This automation will be key to helping companies achieve their digital transformation goals. You know, we've been talking about digital transformation for a decade, but few have truly achieved it.

BMC wants to deliver the ease of use seen in apps like Uber or iFood into the enterprise experience. Imagine requesting services within your company – vacation scheduling, WiFi access – with that same simplicity. 

BMC wants to empower employees to provide an even better experience for external clients. So, the transformation begins internally and extends out. BMC isn't just an ITSM solution anymore – it's a solution for the whole enterprise. You can manage any case, automate any workflow – IT infrastructure monitoring or streamlining HR processes. You don't miss deadlines, you avoid fines. It's about providing a solution that scales across the business, not just within the IT department. 

That's why it's a harder sell sometimes, but if you sell it with that broader vision, it's much more compelling.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Flag as inappropriate
Akshay Manchalwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Support Engineer at Cybage Software
Real User
Top 5
Helps to monitor data and alerts when it is triggered
Pros and Cons
  • "The product is easy to learn."

    What is our primary use case?

    The product helps to monitor data and alerts when it is triggered. 

    What is most valuable?

    The product is easy to learn. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using the product for eight months. 

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    My company has 60 users. 

    How are customer service and support?

    I haven't contacted the tool's technical support yet. 

    How was the initial setup?

    Sumo Logic Observability's deployment is easy. 

    What other advice do I have?

    It would be best to explore it as much as possible so that you can use it easily. The product is easy to troubleshoot. You should undergo some training before using it. I rate the tool an eight out of ten. 

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate