Share your experience using Vade for M365

My use cases for Proofpoint Email Protection revolve around its design for email protection and information protection, especially if you want to implement DLP policies. Proofpoint Email Protection is an excellent tool for identifying spammers and phishing emails. Depending on purchasing power, Proofpoint Email Protection offers various protection levels, such as basic, advanced, and very advanced options. As per customer requirements, Proofpoint Email Protection is customizable, providing features such as email authentication, email defense, and spam detection. Email administrators can analyze and enhance their security measures using Proofpoint Email Protection.

In terms of email protection, my experience is primarily with Proofpoint Email Protection, while I have also used Microsoft Defender and earlier utilized Mimecast. I have expertise in both Mimecast and Microsoft Defender but considerably more experience with Proofpoint Email Protection.

I do not use file sharing with Proofpoint Email Protection; my focus is solely on email protection and DLP policy for information protection.

Proofpoint Email Protection's best feature is the rare occurrence of spam emails; it occurs very occasionally—once in a while each year. This excellent feature means we do not frequently encounter phishing emails, as Proofpoint Email Protection continuously updates virus definitions responsible for protecting the environment.

Proofpoint Email Protection provides high visibility into people-based risk, allowing users to define spam scores, so if a score of 98% is set, emails above that threshold should not reach users. Users can assess the legitimacy of emails, marking them as block or safe senders. Additionally, Proofpoint Email Protection guides users through training to help them identify which links to click.

As a SOC analyst, using Proofpoint Email Protection simplifies my workload by configuring email alerts; anything happening triggers alerts that come through quickly. I can easily analyze logs and customize options as per my organization's needs, allowing me to manage audit requirements efficiently.

Using Proofpoint Email Protection significantly reduces the number of threats I need to guard against; within a month, my organization sends and receives over 1 million emails, achieving 99.99% protection against phishing and spam, and handling around 5 to 10 million emails monthly while assigning a project manager for ongoing review.

Regarding Proofpoint Email Protection's capabilities in addressing modern security challenges, I assess it as excellent; it does not let phishing or spam emails bypass its defenses and is very strong.

After implementing Proofpoint Email Protection, I have noted improvements in operational efficiency due to their excellent support, which is prompt and responsive, often resolving issues within one or two hours, unlike other providers such as Microsoft, which has poor support.

In the future, I would like Proofpoint Email Protection to implement a search feature, enabling users to find specific threats easily. I suggested this to my Proofpoint Email Protection support during a meeting, and they mentioned it would be forwarded to development.

I have worked with Proofpoint Email Protection for around 10 years.

I have not experienced performance issues or limitations with Proofpoint Email Protection's stability and scalability.

I have not experienced performance issues or limitations with Proofpoint Email Protection's stability and scalability.

Proofpoint Email Protection's initial setup experience is straightforward; it typically requires setting SPF and MX records, with support available during the setup process, usually completed within one to two hours.

I rate the tech support of Proofpoint Email Protection as a 10.

Proofpoint Email Protection's initial setup experience is straightforward; it typically requires setting SPF and MX records, with support available during the setup process, usually completed within one to two hours.

The pricing of Proofpoint Email Protection generally ranges from about five to seven dollars per user per month for advanced protection, which includes most features.

Although the pricing of Proofpoint Email Protection is somewhat high compared to products such as Mimecast, when it comes to security, sometimes cost should not be a factor.

I advise organizations considering Proofpoint Email Protection to assess their requirements since Proofpoint Email Protection offers different models starting from two dollars for basic protection. For sophisticated features such as TRAP, if a suspicious email passes through, Proofpoint Email Protection quickly identifies and removes it from the user's inbox, a capability that has recently been implemented.

My organization coordinates directly with a sales team that works with Proofpoint Email Protection support to purchase Proofpoint Email Protection.

I would rate Proofpoint Email Protection as a 10 out of 10; it excels as a product and solution.

I find Proofpoint Email Protection particularly effective for financial institutions and health insurance; I recommend it in such critical situations. For less sensitive data, organizations might choose Microsoft Defender to save costs. However, for highly sensitive data, I endorse Proofpoint Email Protection, as cost should not be a concern.

If you follow Proofpoint Email Protection's policies as per design, there are no downsides, though they have recently implemented AI features that were lacking a few years back. For example, through cloud providers, Proofpoint Email Protection uses TRAP and AI algorithms. Proofpoint Email Protection is number one in the market for email security, as even Microsoft Defender falls short in comparison. My overall rating for Proofpoint Email Protection is 10 out of 10.

Barracuda Email Protection is deployed on one of my clients, serving as the main email web gateway to deliver and receive emails. It has been set up as a DNS record method and is used to scan for potentially spam or phishing emails and harmful emails to block them. It is also used to protect unauthorized disclosure of data from my clients to the outside world.

The best features Barracuda Email Protection offers are its Advanced Threat Protection and Incident Response feature. As a SOC analyst or an incident responder, I am fond of the capability of the real-time monitoring and forensics of Barracuda Email Protection. I can quickly see what the content of the email is and receive alerts if any potential phishing emails or spam emails are detected as I want. I can also identify who interacted with those suspicious emails to limit any incidents that may occur. The bulk remediation feature is something that I am satisfied with.

With Advanced Threat Protection, what I appreciate is the real-time scanning of attachments and the real-time spam protection system.

Barracuda Email Protection has positively impacted my client's organization by reducing almost 50 to 60 percent of phishing emails, making it more secure and allowing us to feel safe from phishing incidents. Overall, the spam protection is also working great and has reduced a large number of spam emails being received by the organization. The phishing protection also works exceptionally well.

I wish the interface of Barracuda Email Protection could have worked in a more responsive way, as sometimes I feel it is slow or laggy when I try to interact with it.

I have been using Barracuda Email Protection for around the last one year.

Barracuda Email Protection is quite stable in my experience.

Barracuda Email Protection has handled increases in users or email volume very well.

I have not reached out to Barracuda Email Protection's customer support directly, but my colleagues have, and they say it was a very good or very pleasant experience.

I did not use any solution before Barracuda Email Protection; I was using the basic security provided by Outlook in Exchange only.

I am not sure about the financial part, as I was not the one who deployed or participated in licensing discussions. However, preventing incidents or seeing a reduction in the volume of incidents is something that reflects a good return on investment.

I do not have insights regarding pricing, setup cost, or licensing, as I was not part of those discussions.

I did not evaluate any other options before choosing Barracuda Email Protection.

To measure that 50 to 60 percent reduction, there was no baseline created, but that is a behavior I observed on Barracuda Email Protection's dashboard and from the users. I was able to see the number of emails being blocked as phishing or spam, and also some emails that were getting allowed, probably due to some configuration issue. That is how I derived the number. My review rating for Barracuda Email Protection is 10.