Could you please describe a few use cases for it? What do you use it for? How do you use it?
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
Could you please describe a few use cases for it? What do you use it for? How do you use it?
From the features perspective, are there any specific features in the Mimecast Email Security that you find the most effective in intercepting phishing attempts?
To clarify, you mentioned that you are using the AI-driven structure in their Abnormal functionality to indicate phishing attempts. Do you use any AI within Mimecast Email Security?
Have you worked with or utilized the targeted threat protection in the Mimecast Email Security?
If I ask you about the room for improvement, we discussed the phishing aspect, the DNS system, and the key rotation. Apart from that, are there any other areas that you would like to see improved or enhanced in the Mimecast Email Security?
The solution has been in use for more than five years.
What are your thoughts on the technical support of the Mimecast Email Security?
On a scale of one to 10, where 10 is the best, how would you rate the technical support of the Mimecast Email Security?
Neutral
Can I ask you about the initial setup process of the Mimecast Email Security? Do you find it straightforward? Is it complex somehow?
I have a question about the ROI, regarding the cost efficiency and operational efficiency of the Mimecast Email Security. Do you have any data to share with us? Do you find it cost-effective? Are there any measurable benefits?
Do you know anything about the pricing and cost of the Mimecast Email Security?
Based on your rich experience with the Mimecast Email Security, what kind of advice or recommendation can you share with users who are considering it? The reviewer gave Mimecast Email Security a rating of 10 out of 10.
Email security is the primary use case for which our clients mainly used Proofpoint Email Protection.
We have used it for email security.
From my perspective as a partner, the most beneficial feature of Proofpoint Email Protection is mostly spam filtering; it was very efficient, and we were very happy with the functionality as only relevant emails were allowed for mailboxes.
The Advanced Threat Protection feature was also effective, and we have used the sandbox feature, which was very beneficial.
From a business perspective, the solution was very helpful as it speeded our business flow and increased email delivery.
It became very expensive due to the nature of local circumstances, and I may advise Proofpoint to adjust marketing solutions based on each country.
I had experience with Proofpoint Email Protection for more than five or six years.
It was very fast, and we didn't experience any interruptions whatsoever.
I would rate scalability of Proofpoint Email Protection as very scalable.
We are still using Exchange, but left Proofpoint Email Protection.
The installation of Proofpoint Email Protection was very straightforward as we used the web interface, so simple settings and definitions on the ISP site were enough for the whole setup.
At the very beginning, we were working directly with the UK, but then we have been redirected to a local partner, and as far as I remember, we worked for one year with the local partner.
We used to get a partner business partner in my country.
The reason we stopped using Proofpoint Email Protection was cost.
Pricing was the issue.
I would rate pricing from 8 to 10.
The integration with our on-premise Exchange was very straightforward as we just redirected all email traffic over Proofpoint Email Protection.
I am still receiving emails from Proofpoint's site.
My job title is IT director.
On a scale of 1-10, I rate Proofpoint Email Protection a 7.
