Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Share your experience using Planview Barometer

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 98,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Citizen Developer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Has supported daily process modeling and compliance tracking while reporting speed and search functions need improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "The borderline architecture of MEGA HOPEX creates a very good overview of how all of the things in our organization fit together through these relations that you create between objects in the system."
  • "The searching functionality in MEGA HOPEX has gotten worse over the updates. They introduced more steps for finding the same things as before, which is not ideal."

What is our primary use case?

I use MEGA HOPEX for everyday work.

I do a little bit of everything with MEGA HOPEX; I use it as an end user, but I also do development and integrations for the system, and I provide on-site support for other people who use the system.

I am primarily using MEGA HOPEX for controls and compliance. I fill out compliance-related items in the system, and if people need help making changes, I assist with that. I use the majority of the modules in MEGA HOPEX to a certain extent, either through testing new integrations or helping people utilize it.

We use process modeling extensively in MEGA HOPEX. In my employment, we are very reliant on the modeling capabilities of MEGA HOPEX because every single person who works at this bank uses the processes that we make through the modeling system. All of the instructions and process modeling are commonly used, helping ensure everything is done correctly and in an effective manner.

I am not completely sure how MEGA HOPEX supports compliance initiatives, but we use the compliance module. We use the control modules and compliance modules, and we ensure that everything runs properly.

What is most valuable?

The borderline architecture of MEGA HOPEX creates a very good overview of how all of the things in our organization fit together through these relations that you create between objects in the system. I think that's really powerful because it provides the means to do some very solid reporting.

When you have governance created in MEGA HOPEX, it makes it easier for everyone to be aligned. People have this one way of doing things, and if something is not working, then we change it to fit the current ruling governance so that everything is done effectively.

For the average user of MEGA HOPEX, I am one of two people doing all of the setup for the reporting. Since the reporting is so customizable, it's up to what each individual wants to report. It's very strong and versatile in terms of what you are able to report on inside of MEGA HOPEX. The customizability for displaying things specifically how anyone wants is very strong. However, generating the reports in MEGA HOPEX is pretty slow when you have a lot of data, which we have, so sometimes it could take upwards of 12 to 16 minutes to generate one of the report views, which is a downside.

What needs improvement?

The default dashboards in MEGA HOPEX are not actually utilized much. We customize the front pages for our needs, so we are not using the dashboard so much because we have the customized starting pages.

The searching functionality in MEGA HOPEX has gotten worse over the updates. They introduced more steps for finding the same things as before, which is not ideal. In terms of speed, that could be different depending on where you host and deploy your system, but sometimes it feels it could be faster, especially with the reporting.

Keeping the old search in MEGA HOPEX would be beneficial as it seemed to work fine. I'm not really understanding the decision making behind the new search because it doesn't seem to work effectively either. That might change in the future.

For how long have I used the solution?

I started using MEGA HOPEX when I was employed at my banking job, which has been a little over a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

That's one of the aspects of MEGA HOPEX that I'm also partly responsible for. It runs stable in our case, but I suppose that depends on how adept you are at using the system. Generally, we don't experience much trouble with it at all.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

MEGA HOPEX has been quite scalable. There have been many new good additions to the system in terms of the updates and upgrades they are doing. The system in general, despite having a learning curve because there are so many different intertwined modules, is a very versatile and scalable system for any type of organization, whether big, small, or medium.

How are customer service and support?

I often just use the community site for MEGA HOPEX if I have questions about improvements and suggestions. We are not very involved with the support because we have people who can fix many of the issues internally, so we don't really have many issues yearly that we need to forward to MEGA support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have only used MEGA HOPEX, so my opinion would be biased. Despite having a learning curve and some hassles here and there, I genuinely think it's a good system, so I would give it an eight, maybe a seven.

What other advice do I have?

The documentation for MEGA HOPEX is pretty documented. All of the different modules and how you use it as an end user is documented, but in terms of the backend technical aspects, I would say it's pretty limited and many things you'll have to find out yourself.

Most people who have MEGA HOPEX system don't actually develop for it utilizing the system in the backend. Usually, people get this system to utilize the front end modeling that the system has, so I don't think that's necessarily important, and most of these things you would be able to find out yourself if you spend time with it.

On the development side of things with MEGA HOPEX, if you do custom things, it's very documented in terms of anything else such as the modules and how you use it front end-wise. How every object in the system connects and how you create new things and update things is pretty documented.

I rate MEGA HOPEX eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Flag as inappropriate
HemantKUMAR6 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Architect at Sopra Steria
Real User
Top 20
Customer support has delayed successful upgrade to supported version
Pros and Cons
  • "The main valuable features are the logical and physical data modeling capabilities, and our main purpose is to keep the data model in a repository and then be able to generate DDL files for Oracle."
  • "They didn't spend any time on the issue because according to them, 16.5 is not supported."

What is our primary use case?

We mainly use it for logical and physical data modeling. Our main objective is to keep a repository of our logical and physical model, and then generate DDL files for Oracle out of it. This is our main usage. Our installation is simple with only two users, so we don't have a multi-user environment.

What is most valuable?

The main valuable features are the logical and physical data modeling capabilities. Our main purpose is to keep the data model in a repository and then be able to generate DDL files for Oracle. The product is excellent. For the last four years, we haven't faced any issues. While we are experiencing a one-off issue during migration at the moment, things should be sorted soon. Apart from customer support, I would definitely give the product 9 out of 10.

What needs improvement?

It was a long time back when my company purchased it, but I am now participating in upgrading it to the latest version. I found customer support to be tedious during the upgrade process to the latest version. I tried to upgrade to a trial version before purchasing a new license. During that process, I had some technical issues. When trying to go from 12.5 to 16.5, I could migrate but faced technical challenges. When I approached customer support, they informed me that even 16.5 is not supported. They stated I would need to go to 16.7 before they could look at my issue. They didn't spend any time on the issue because according to them, 16.5 is not supported. Until I get 16.7 and complete the migration, I'm not getting any help from them. I was not too happy with the customer support.

This was my only interaction with customer support, and I haven't received any resolution to my issue. It can be rated as low as zero because that's the only time I approached them. I cannot even say zero out of ten because I approached only once. Perhaps they are correct that they don't support 16.5, so they don't want to spend any time on that.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the solution for about four years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is reliable. For the last four years, we haven't faced any issues. We are experiencing a one-off issue during migration at the moment, but things should be sorted soon.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Our main objective is to upgrade to the supported version and be able to do whatever we are doing at the moment. It should behave exactly the same way as it was behaving in 12.5. That is the objective. If there are any differences, we will address them when we discover them.

How are customer service and support?

I found customer support to be tedious during the upgrade process to the latest version. I tried to upgrade to a trial version before purchasing a new license. During that process, I had technical issues. When trying to go from 12.5 to 16.5, I could migrate but faced technical challenges. When I approached customer support, they informed me that 16.5 is not supported. They stated I would need to go to 16.7 before they could look at my issue. They didn't spend any time on the issue because according to them, 16.5 is not supported. Until I get 16.7 and complete the migration, I'm not getting any help from them. I was not too happy with the customer support.

This was my only interaction with customer support, and I haven't received any resolution to my issue. It can be rated as low as zero because that's the only time I approached them.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Negative

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

A long time back I was using Erwin. It was quite good. I found Erwin really good for analytical applications and data warehousing. Now we are using SAP PowerDesigner for more operational systems. Both solutions are good.

How was the initial setup?

It was a long time back when my company purchased it, but I am now participating in upgrading it to the latest version. Our installation is simple with only two users, so we don't have a multi-user environment.

What about the implementation team?

We have a simple installation with only two users, so we don't have a multi-user environment.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

A long time back I was using Erwin, which was quite good. Erwin was excellent for analytical applications and data warehousing. Now we are using SAP PowerDesigner for more operational systems. Both solutions are good.

What other advice do I have?

We mainly use it for logical and physical data modeling. Our main objective is to keep a repository of our logical and physical model, and then generate DDL files for Oracle. The customer support needs improvement, particularly during version upgrades. I experienced difficulties when trying to upgrade from 12.5 to 16.5, and support would not assist until upgrading to version 16.7. Overall, I rate this solution 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Flag as inappropriate