No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Share your experience using CData Sync

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 108,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Sr. Executive Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Apr 15, 2026
Reliable replication has strengthened disaster recovery and supports smooth server migrations
Pros and Cons
  • "NetApp SnapMirror has positively impacted my organization because it is a very helpful feature for any organization that needs to create a DR site for disaster recovery."

    What is our primary use case?

    I can elaborate on how I am using NetApp SnapMirror for server migration for one of my clients. We create a cluster, establish intercluster connectivity for the server migration, and then create cluster peering. After that, we configure server peering. We create a DP volume on the destination and then configure NetApp SnapMirror on the destination with a five-minute replication interval from source to destination.

    How has it helped my organization?

    NetApp SnapMirror has positively impacted my organization because it is a very helpful feature for any organization that needs to create a DR site for disaster recovery. NetApp SnapMirror replicates all of the data to the DR site, and with this feature, we can replicate all of the data to the DR site using an asynchronous policy.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features that NetApp SnapMirror offers for me are the replication features, as we can replicate all of the data to the DR site, which is very helpful for disaster recovery.

    NetApp SnapMirror has positively impacted my organization because it is a very helpful feature for any organization that needs to create a DR site for disaster recovery. NetApp SnapMirror replicates all of the data to the DR site, and with this feature, we can replicate all of the data to the DR site using an asynchronous policy.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been familiar with NetApp SnapMirror for six years, specifically for server migration.

    What other advice do I have?

    There is nothing that has been frustrating with NetApp SnapMirror; I think it is already a better option. I give this product an overall rating of 8.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
    Last updated: Apr 15, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    Tanveer Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
    Chief Technical Office at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
    Real User
    Top 10
    Nov 13, 2025
    Snapshots have enabled us to restore critical data quickly and confidently after unexpected changes
    Pros and Cons
    • "The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something; it gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else."
    • "The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something; it gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else."
    • "The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something; it gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else."
    • "The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something; it gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else."
    • "In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost."
    • "In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost."
    • "In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost."
    • "In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost."

    What is our primary use case?

    My use case for using NetApp Snapshot is its feature of taking a snapshot so that if there is any change, I can go back to the old restore point. This feature exists in Windows and is an essential feature for any storage.

    For disaster recovery, NetApp Snapshot is a key product for me.

    For data replication, I was working only with NetApp Snapshot and I did not compare it with other vendors.

    What is most valuable?

    The functions or features I have found most valuable in NetApp Snapshot are that it is easy to do and takes very little time.

    The main benefits that NetApp Snapshot provides for me are that if anything goes wrong, we can go back and restore something. It gives you peace of mind, which saves money, effort, and everything else.

    I use NetApp's WAFL architecture as it is their way of doing things, how to save the files and everything else. It is built-in. You cannot avoid WAFL when you use NetApp.

    Regarding the integration of NetApp Snapshot with applications and workloads, we have NetApp Snapshot integrated with our OpenStack platform.

    What needs improvement?

    In my opinion, what NetApp can do to make NetApp Snapshot better is lower the cost.

    Regarding adding any AI technology to NetApp Snapshot, I do not know and we are not into that yet. Whatever they are doing, they are doing well and I do not see much room for improvement. From our usage point of view, it is acceptable.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I would rate the stability of NetApp Snapshot as nine or ten.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    So far so good for scalability, I would rate it a nine.

    How are customer service and support?

    I would rate NetApp's technical support as seven. It can improve.

    Regarding response time or quality, the response time is acceptable, but quality can be better.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Before I started working with NetApp Snapshot, we used an EMC platform, not for replication, but for storage.

    How was the initial setup?

    NetApp Snapshot has a simple setup process.

    What other advice do I have?

    I am still using NetApp, the same vendor, and NetApp continues to be my choice.

    I am mostly working with solutions like the A250 from NetApp, the AFF A250.

    Regarding ONTAP or A800, ONTAP is available and I am working with ONTAP.

    I am working with ONTAP On-Prem.

    NetApp provides a few AFF solutions, and I am working with NVMe A-Series.

    I am working with the 250 model.

    I am not really using solutions such as SnapCenter, Cloud Data Sense, or ACA. SaaS backup is not something I use.

    I am only working with one product from NetApp, and these are software features.

    I am not working with Virtual Desktop Services, Keystone, or OnCommand Insight.

    We are indeed using NetApp Snapshot from NetApp, another feature, not SnapCenter.

    I have been working with NetApp Snapshot from the beginning.

    I do not do the day-to-day work when it comes to automation in NetApp Snapshot. I personally do the technical management, procurement, and everything else. I do not work hands-on.

    I can recommend NetApp Snapshot to other users.

    I would rate this review overall as a nine.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: Nov 13, 2025
    Flag as inappropriate