Share your experience using iSpring Suite

My main use case for Udemy Business is for cybersecurity training. As a FinTech company, we have utilized many compliance courses that are available on Udemy Business to train many of the people that work with customers.

In my opinion, the best features Udemy Business offers are the huge options of courses, which are very useful. Out of all those course options, the compliance ISO 27001 course stands out to me as especially valuable.

Udemy Business has definitely been helpful in answering security questionnaires for cybersecurity awareness, as we are able to verify completion very easily now. Since using Udemy Business, it has definitely made compliance training faster and made it easier to deal with customers who ask these questions.

I do not have any suggestions for improvement, as I cannot criticize it; I cannot find any criticism for it. It is too early to tell if there is even one area for improvement.

I have been using Udemy Business for four months now.

In my experience, Udemy Business is stable.

Its scalability has been great with us so far.

Customer support is great. We rated customer support a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10.

Positive

This is the first time we are trying something like Udemy Business.

I see a safe return on investment with Udemy Business, as definitely fewer employee resources are being used, and the courses are reusable.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very smooth, with no issues; it was just a couple of clicks.

We did not evaluate other options before choosing Udemy Business; we went straight with it because we knew what we wanted even before.

I would advise others looking into using Udemy Business to definitely go for it, as it is very good. I have given this review a rating of 10.

I started using QA Cloud Training & Certification three months ago. The course taught me to think in a structured quality-first way. In my daily work, I now catch issues very early and validate requirements very clearly. It has removed the dependency on external QA for testing my internal builds, which I previously gave to QA.

For my work, it really simplified automating repeated testing, such as writing test cases and understanding cloud-based test environments. Initially, I tested only on one environment, but the course taught me that if your company has more than one or two environments, like UAT and production, you need to test on every environment to ensure things work properly.

When there is a web build and a mobile app build, both are different. In mobile app builds, you don't need tools like Selenium. You only need the QA mindset to find bugs rather than simply pointing them out to the developer. The main things to validate are APIs, UI, and integrations in CI/CD, thinking about quality from design to development. You don't code just to create a pull request. You code in a manner so that it's bug-free.

I have documented test strategies and frameworks. One improvement could be to include knowledge of all programming languages, as test code parameters sometimes don't suggest compatibility with other languages. Being a React developer, I have written test code pull requests in React, but I'm not certain the same code might work for others. If there were a possibility, making the test code generic so it works across React, JavaScript, and many other languages would be beneficial.

QA Cloud Training & Certification reduces manual debugging and manual QA testing. Developers can catch errors first. Once I learned these techniques, I shared best practices with my teammates and showed the juniors cloud testing tools, strategies, and automation flows that they can use while reviewing pull requests with the QA cloud mindset.

Every developer should go through this course. It's not only for Quality Assurance engineers. Every developer should take it to have the skills of both QA and developer combined.

I took this course outside of my organization as a personal initiative. It helped me build scalable testing automation frameworks to run tests in cloud environments. I can write test cases and do other coding instead of manually testing. Testing APIs, UI, and microservices has become much more effective.

After learning from this course, I know that I can rely on faster and safer releases. It has reduced regression risks, including code-breaking fixes. It has better helped me test the coverage of builds in distributed systems. Before, I learned about bugs manually, and now my frameworks are working effectively for this.

There is always scope for improvement. If there's no scope for improvement, there's nothing to improve in QA Cloud Training & Certification.

I have been working for the past 3.1 years.

I haven't used any earlier solution. I was manually doing all testing before.

I can't provide specific monetary values, but the time saved has been substantial. I can't give exact numbers for how much time has been saved, but it has been considerable. For every code review, I previously did manual testing. Now I just run automated test cases in the cloud setup framework. For a heavy pull request with approximately a thousand lines of code, it can easily save one to two hours.

I went with the beginner-friendly option to check the free credit details. Once I get more crowd and more engagement, I will go for the enterprise solution.

The main use case was to catch bugs earlier, such as production and release bugs that used to occur, and to improve collaboration between QA and development so that developers are aware of the QA testing process, eliminating the need for QA to do manual testing since developers have already done it.

I created an automation framework where I can test code in pull requests, which has helped juniors understand cloud-based test execution.

If developers want the knowledge of QA as well, they should always pursue it. I gave this review a rating of nine out of ten.