Share your experience using OutMatch

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Product Manager at Heidrick & Struggles International Inc
Real User
AI capabilities helps you find the right folks for your succession plan but issues with scalability
Pros and Cons
  • "Stability is fantastic. In the two years we've used it, I've only experienced one outage."
  • "From my perspective, I think the usability could use some attention. Eightfold.ai offers modules for talent acquisition, talent management, and other areas like projects. They try to use a common UI for all of them, but it really needs to be more persona-based. That's the thing that I struggle with the most."

What is our primary use case?

We've done some customizations on top of it, but it really focuses on leader management at the executive level – things like succession planning and leader development.

We haven't used it from a talent acquisition standpoint. It's really just been for talent management.  We primarily use their succession planning features. The AI component recommends potential successors for roles we're trying to fill or plan for.

How has it helped my organization?

We're just launching it. We have two clients using it. Our company, Heidrick & Struggles, partners with Eightfold.ai, and we use a lot of our own IP, such as digital spend, capabilities, competencies, and culture assessment information. A lot of what we do is gather that assessment data and make recommendations based on that, in addition to Eightfold.ai's insights. It's a combination of the two that really helps us accurately identify the best fit for executive leadership roles. 

It's purely data-driven, so we try to take human bias out of the process. That's really the sweet spot for this solution – the partnership between Heidrick's components and Eightfold's components. 

The AI recommends potential leaders, so you don't have to do a ton of thinking. You still want some human interaction, but from a pure recommendation standpoint, it reduces the bias you'd get if you did not use data points for these decisions.

What is most valuable?

I really like the AI piece. It helps you find the right folks for your succession plan. I think that's where Eightfold.ai has an edge over other competitors.

What needs improvement?

From my perspective, I think the usability could use some attention. Eightfold.ai offers modules for talent acquisition, talent management, and other areas like projects. They try to use a common UI for all of them, but it really needs to be more persona-based. That's the thing that I struggle with the most.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using it for about two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability is fantastic. In the two years we've used it, I've only experienced one outage.

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability a five out of ten, one being easy to scale and ten being difficult to scale. There are a lot of manual components at this point. Since you have to ingest a large amount of leader data, that process is currently very manual with file feeds.

How are customer service and support?

The customer service and support are horrible. They could improve in terms of friendliness and responsiveness. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Negative

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This was a solution we sought to build. We did research to determine the best partner, and through that process, we selected Eightfold.ai. So we didn't have a pre-existing solution in this area.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very complex. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with one being highly complex and ten being easy to set up. 

The deployment took about seven or eight months. 

What about the implementation team?

We use Amazon Web Services and Azure DevOps for deployment, so there's a lot of technical folks involved. So, there were probably ten people total involved in the deployment.

Maintenance is mainly required for onboarding new users and handling feature progression. As Eightfold.ai releases new features, our DevOps team and our managed services teams work with clients to implement them. 

Eightfold.ai hosts their side of things, so we don't have to worry about that piece. However, there's some additional complexity for us because we also integrate other applications within the Heidrick suite.

But just focusing on the Eightfold.ai perspective, there's not a lot of maintenance other than managing feature releases and moving those through our staging, UAT, and then enterprise environments.

What was our ROI?

Eightfold.ai contributed to reducing the hiring costs or improving employee retention for our clients. 

It helps reduce that cost from both an overhead and employee headcount perspective. For the client, it reduces overhead costs because they're not managing spreadsheets. The system takes care of all that.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is expensive. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive. 

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend it to others. The AI piece is really what drove our decision to select Eightfold.ai. It truly fulfills the need when combined with our own intellectual property and the data points we gather. From that perspective, it serves the purpose well.

Eightfold.ai's data is robust, and as time goes on, the system learns and improves our recommendations. So, it's more about the learning aspect and being able to accurately pinpoint leaders with the right skill sets.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Flag as inappropriate
HR Manager at NCSoft
Real User
Users can directly see the menu, click on what they need, and know what to do
Pros and Cons
  • "I like its UI and UX. When we were using Oracle or SAP, the UI/UX wasn't very user-friendly for the employees."
  • "Workday does not support many Korean language features. So, it will be great if they have some development on the Korean language side – then it will be really powerful in our market."

What is our primary use case?

I was in charge of HR operations at the time; I did operational things like approving documents, issuing them in the system, and also trying to recruit nicely. 

Sometimes, I also handle some pre-onboarding tasks, like collecting data or documents and approving parts of the onboarding process.

How has it helped my organization?

It really helped our team. Especially for me, I could feel that my workload as an HR operation manager was cut by 50%.

Since the data was very organized in Workday, it was convenient for me to see specific employee datasets. The advanced analytics features have become better over time.

Workday's integration capabilities with other systems benefited our work. We combined Workday with LinkedIn Learning. It worked well for the learning management part.

What is most valuable?

I like its UI and UX. When we were using Oracle or SAP, the UI/UX wasn't very user-friendly for my employees. Workday has a much better interface. Users can directly see the menu, click on what they need, and know what to do. I think that really helps my job as an HR operation manager.

So it's very user-friendly. That aligns with its focus on UX.

What needs improvement?

Workday does not support many Korean language features. So, it will be great if they have some development on the Korean language side – then it will be really powerful in our market.

So there should be development in the Korean language features.

For how long have I used the solution?

I used it when I participated in the implementation projects. So, I have been using it for two years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability was better than other systems I've used. I would rate Workday's stability an eight out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a very scalable product. For my branch, there are around 20 end users. They are HR specialists. 

In Korea, we didn't have dedicated IT personnel for HRIS [Human Resources Information System]. Support resources were in the headquarters or through a shared service located in China.

How are customer service and support?

There aren't many Korean language features. Korean market was not a significant focus for Workday. So, the support wasn't as strong as it could be.

There is room for improvement in customer service and support. 

In Korea, we have more complexities in labor law, so the system logic is very different from the US or European countries. Workday needs more Korean experts who understand the kinds of things that are needed, specifically in Korea. That would be helpful.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

Every system was really hard to set up initially, but I think Workday was okay because it had a really user-friendly UI and UX. When we were implementing the system, we could directly see what we were doing with each feature. So, it was better than others.

I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, with ten being easy and one being difficult. 

The deployment took one and a half years but that was just the first phase. We needed to keep upgrading the system. So, the first phase established a good foundation, and almost everything was in place. So,  it was one and a half years.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's very, very expensive. When I was in a startup company, we tried to adopt Workday. We called them and asked how much it would cost for our company. And the first answer from the salesperson was, "It's really expensive."

What other advice do I have?

If you have enough money for the digital transformation of your HR system, Workday is one of the best ways to go. You don't need to do as much customization during implementation as other systems.

Workday is experienced and mature product. It is probably the number one company for HRIS [Human Resource Information System] right now. The experience is really helpful for a company's first HR transformation. And also, most of Workday's features are not just okay, but more than good.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate