Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Share your experience using IBM WebSphere BPMS

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 102,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Jun 26, 2025
Developers gain flexibility to build custom controls with numerous integration options
Pros and Cons
  • "IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."
  • "Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."

What is our primary use case?

IBM WebSphere BPMS allows users to build workflows and dashboards. It is a developer-friendly product.

The product features a great UI interface that is mobile-friendly, tab-friendly, and desktop-friendly, enabling users to easily build and integrate with any platforms. It functions as a low-code platform.

IBM WebSphere BPMS has adapted to changes in our business processes over time. The evolution did not happen overnight; it took approximately five years from 2020. Since we started using this product, we have evolved significantly. There has been substantial improvement in the process of our applications.

What is most valuable?

The best features of IBM WebSphere BPMS are its low-code platform capabilities and easy integration with any product.

The product deserves a rating of 10 out of 10. It provides developers with extensive flexibility to develop custom controls. They can use any inbuilt controls, with approximately 150 to 200 options available. This flexibility allows developers to create attractive UIs for business users. Customers express satisfaction when presented with this UI compared to previous interfaces.

IBM WebSphere BPMS offers numerous additional features, including integration capabilities. The product comes with many inbuilt adapters that facilitate easy integration with other products.

What needs improvement?

Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases.

Regarding AI-driven process optimizations, we have not implemented these features with IBM WebSphere BPMS. In recent versions, IBM has introduced some generative AI features, and we plan to migrate to the newer versions within approximately one year.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM WebSphere BPMS for several years, since around 2020.

How are customer service and support?

Their support for IBM WebSphere BPMS deserves a rating of 9.5 out of 10.

How would you rate customer service and support?

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup with IBM WebSphere BPMS is straightforward and does not require much time for installation. The deployment process takes less than 10 minutes to complete.

What was our ROI?

IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component.

While specific numbers cannot be revealed regarding the return on investment, there has been a substantial ROI. Previously, there were numerous human interventions which have now been automated. Our organization has implemented extensive automation and utilized this product extensively to integrate with DocuSign and multiple other products, adding considerable value for our customers.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

While I am not familiar with the exact pricing of IBM WebSphere BPMS, compared to its competitor Pega, it appears to be more cost-effective.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Due to lack of familiarity with Pega, I cannot identify specific differences between IBM WebSphere BPMS and Pega.

What other advice do I have?

Understanding the benefits and improvements that come with using the product is essential.

IBM WebSphere BPMS is performing excellently, and I do not see any significant areas requiring improvement.

I would recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS to anybody. Based on my experience, I rate this product 10 out of 10.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jun 26, 2025
Flag as inappropriate
Senior Project Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Mar 14, 2025
Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."
  • "There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

What is our primary use case?

We use IBM WebSphere BPMS internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various user groups and departments.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot.

What needs improvement?

There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having more agile features would enhance usability.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with IBM WebSphere BPMS for more than five years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The deployment process takes approximately three to four months, including development.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of IBM WebSphere BPMS is very good, and I would rate it as eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of IBM WebSphere BPMS is quite high, and I would rate it eight out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

The standardized ticket system allows us to report issues to IBM support. However, the quality of support could be improved, as sometimes the response does not meet our expectations. I would rate the support six out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Not really, we did not evaluate other products before using IBM WebSphere BPMS.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is rated as a seven out of ten in terms of difficulty. It is low to medium in terms of complexity.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing of IBM WebSphere BPMS is reasonable for our company in Hong Kong.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other solutions before using IBM WebSphere BPMS.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven out of ten overall, which reflects it as a good solution.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.