Tomcat Reviews

We use Tomcat as an application bucket for our Linux and Windows environments.

The product's pricing needs improvement.

I rate Tomcat's stability a nine out of ten.

We have 500 Tomcat users in our organization. It is a scalable platform. We plan to increase the usage.

We used Red Hat before.

The product is straightforward to set up. We have deployed it in a production environment. It took three years to complete. The process was executed by a team of ten technical executives, including engineers and developers.

We implemented the product with the help of an integrator.

We have purchased Tomcat's yearly license. It is an expensive product.

I recommend Tomcat to others and rate it a seven out of ten.

Tomcat's best feature is the open source server.

It's a flexible and lightweight solution.

Tomcat is not user-friendly. I would also like to be able to have multiple applications run at the same time.

In the next release, I would like to see better security features.

I've been using this solution for more than six years.

It is stable.

Tomcat is a scalable product. More than 100 people use it in my company.

The technical support is good, and I rate them at eight out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is very easy.

Tomcat is an open source solution.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Tomcat an eight.

I have used Apache Tomcat for various applications in our operational environment. We are a traffic service provider, and our operational department needs various types of proprietary applications.

In our environment, Tomcat is reliable and secure. We don't have to make many changes, and the applications work as expected.

Tomcat is reliable and secure, which makes it valuable for our application deployment. We do not have to intervene much to make changes.

Perhaps there could be an easier way to configure some advanced features. The learning curve to earn advanced skills is too steep.

I have been using Apache Tomcat for more than ten years.

It is very stable.

Tomcat is scalable. I would rate it an eight out of ten for scalability.

I have never consulted Apache support.

Positive

Personally, I rarely work on Tomcat. However, if I had to rate the setup from one to ten, with ten meaning easy, I would rate it an eight.

Tomcat is completely free of charge.

I would recommend using Tomcat because it is simple to integrate and use.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We developed a Java application, which was a content management application, and deployed it on the Apache Tomcat server.

We can use Apache Tomcat for Java server applications. We can use Apache Tomcat for application servers as well as web servers. We can easily deploy a Java project in Apache Tomcat.

Tomcat's cache could be improved. Tomcat's performance is less than other solutions like IBM WebSphere or JBoss.

I have been using Tomcat for nearly five years.

Tomcat is a stable solution.

Tomcat's initial setup is a little bit difficult.

Tomcat is not costlier than other solutions.

I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate Tomcat a nine out of ten.

The solution is readily available and open-source. 

Tomcat needs to improve its stability. 

Tomcat is stable. 

I rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. 

Tomcat's installation is easy and takes 10-20 minutes to complete. You need to download the solution and install it. 

We can do the tool's deployment in-house. 

I rate the tool a nine out of ten. 

Our primary case use is for case logs. When the customer tries to log into the application and the webpage does not open I check it from the integration of Tomcat.

I would like to see the APM tools enhanced for all customers. Some APM customers are not yet fully integrated. I would also like to see a dashboard with some integrations in order to see the logs and trace performance easier.

I have been using Tomcat for the past four years.

Tomcat is not always stable and but I have not used another server yet to compare the overall stability.

The scalability overall is good.

The initial setup is straightforward. The time frame of the deployment depends on configurations and parameters that a company may have.

We are currently using the open-source version.

I would rate Tomcat a ten on a scale of one to ten.

Our company is in healthcare, and Tomcat provides a backend server for our REST solution. Tomcat is widely used in Chile as a backend solution for web service and REST environments. Companies frequently use Spring Boot with a Tomcat environment. I'm a developer at a small company, and only 10 people use Tomcat here, but the company has around 100 employees in all. 

Tomcat is a simple, light environment, whereas the full Red Hat Fuse solution is heavier. 

Security integration in Tomcat is complicated. We need to use another tool to solve the security issues.

We have used Tomcat for two years.

We have some problems with the performance in terms of transactions per second, but Tomcat is stable.

It is easy to scale the solution if you use more CPUs.

Tomcat is an Apache open-source project, so it doesn't have technical support. 

We were using Red Hat Fuse for a Camel solution. Camel is another Apache product we use internally.  Two years ago, we switched our backend solution.  I was working with a bank, and we needed an integration platform. It was a relatively simple project.

Deploying Tomcat is straightforward.

Tomcat is a free solution, but you need to pay the Java Oracle license in a commercial environment.

I rate Tomcat eight out of 10. My only issue with it is the security. You need to use another solution.

We primarily use the solution on our main e-commerce web page.

Compared to Oracle Web Projects, it's very user-friendly and the administration is very simple. The navigation is very intuitive.

The deployment process is very fast.

The solution is very stable. 

I don't have too much experience with monitoring, however, it's possible it could be improved. It would be great if they offered more integration of monitoring tools.

The management maybe can be improved a bit. 

I've used the solution for a small instance in the past. We have used it for three or four months now in a bigger instance. We've only used it for a few months at this point, and therefore, it's still pretty new to us.

The stability is good. We haven't had any issues. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

The scalability is good. We have a structure that we can easily scale up or down. It's very simple for us.

We haven't contacted technical support. We haven't needed any assistance. Therefore, I cannot speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

I've also used Oracle WebLogic. 

The initial setup is very easy to install. It's very easy. A company shouldn't struggle with the setup process.

The deployment is fast.

I don't have any information on the pricing. I don't handle that aspect of the solution.

That said, my understanding is it's less expensive than, for example, Oracle.

I'm able to compare WebLogic with Tomcat, and I can say that Tomcat beats WebLogic on a number of fronts. It's easier, simpler to deploy, and less expensive. I prefer it. 

We're just customers and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with Tomcat.

We also use the solution on a private cloud as well as on-premises.

I'd rate the product at an eight out of ten. We're pretty happy with it.

I have experience with WebLogic and Tomcat. I'd recommend Tomcat over Oracle, as it's easier to manage and install. It's my understanding that the pricing is a bit lower as well.