What is our primary use case?
Primarily, we wanted to use it as a tool to enable multifactor authentication for our Mac users in both business entities. The goal was to integrate with identity providers such as Microsoft Azure, Okta, and another one that I'm currently blanking on.
In addition to multifactor authentication, it also helps retain the credential set in the Jamf Connect tool once you're logged in. This eliminates the need to log in repeatedly across various web applications, as it integrates and sends the necessary messages to the identity provider (IDP). So it's both a user convenience and an enhanced security feature.
What is most valuable?
Jamf Connect is a pretty simple and straightforward tool overall. It has basically two components. First, there's the component that manages the login window experience on macOS, and then there's the component that manages the experience after you log in, integrating with the sites and everything else.
What needs improvement?
The only real thing that I could say could use improvement is that sometimes there are minor bug issues here and there, which seems to be the case with many Jamf products. They constantly bring out new features and implement many things to support the community.
However, sometimes they have regressions or bugs that resurface in later versions, which can be frustrating considering the professional-level software you are paying for. It seems like they should be more thorough in their code development and testing. So, overall, it's just a lack of consistent experience sometimes with some of their features. On the flip side, they do provide great support overall.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have implemented Jamf Connect at two different business entities over three years. So I've been looking into it for about four years in total. I've been familiar with it over the last three years.
Buyer's Guide
Jamf Connect
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about Jamf Connect. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable. The only minor issue I have encountered is that sometimes when new users receive their machines, there is a slight timing issue where our custom wallpaper background image doesn't appear before the Jamf Connect login window. Instead, they briefly see the default macOS login screen. It's a small compliance concern since they didn't see the special image the very first time, but overall, it's not a significant problem.
I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability-wise, on a scale from one to ten, I would rate it very high. It's a relatively small client running on your local computer that communicates with your IDP. If you're using an Active Directory solution in-house, it can sync up with that as well. So it's quite flexible in terms of compatibility.
In our organization, around 500 users use Jamf Connect.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service and support are great. If we go back five or more years before they became a publicly traded company, Jamf had excellent support. However, since their big public offering two, three, or maybe four years ago, it feels like they have declined a bit. This is often the case with publicly traded companies, as their objective shifts from providing great products to maximizing shareholder value. So instead of a ten, I would give them an eight. They are still pretty good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
How was the initial setup?
I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten.
We were also implementing Jamf Pro and Jamf Connect for device deployment, specifically for zero-touch device deployment. This way, we can easily send the devices to new users and have them log in with their IDP credentials the first time. However, I encountered one issue, which was more due to my lack of knowledge. When I reached out to support, they couldn't provide a solution for me initially. But once I understood how to do it, the process worked smoothly. I was able to implement it repeatedly while experimenting with different settings to meet my organization's needs and get the job done, especially in the context of zero-touch enrollment, where things can be a bit tricky. It seems like the issue I faced was related to the zero-touch enrollment process and the pre-stage enrollment of pro users. It wasn't a problem with Jamf Connect itself.
In my mind, I was operating under the assumption of running Jamf Connect. I was authenticating to the same Identity Provider (IDP) but through the web view that's built into MacOS's setup process. So, I was wondering why it worked in that setup process but didn't work when I tried to authenticate directly through Jamf Connect. Instead, it redirected to the web view.
I have worked in on-prem organizations, including my current one. The previous organization I worked for used the public cloud. Basically, if you had a Pro DataPoint, you could walk around with a drive and plug it into multiple computers. However, that method is not very efficient in the modern era. It's more convenient to use other mobile device management solutions that work with macOS to deploy it. So it's not dependent on using Jamf's infrastructure, but it works better with their built-in app solution, making it more of a one-click job rather than having to perform multiple tasks yourself to set it up.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's relatively inexpensive. However, there aren't many other players in this specific space offering what Jamf Connect does. There's an open-source product called NoMAD that was acquired by Jamf, which they rebranded and repackaged as Jamf Connect. Of course, free is great, but NoMAD only provided active directory integration and IDP integration. There are a few plugins available, like Microsoft's login plugin and Apple's deprecated login plugin from a few years ago, which essentially have similar functionality as the modern macOS.
All of those other options were free, but they didn't offer the same breadth of capabilities as Jamf Connect. Additionally, you would still need to pay for the other aspects of those provider services. For example, Microsoft bundled it with other services for users of Azure Office 365. So, up until a few months ago, the Microsoft product was technically in beta and not fully supported for production environments due to potential support limitations. However, it has now been released as a non-beta product, providing full support.
What other advice do I have?
I'll give it a ten. It's a great product. I can't imagine how we could go back to life before we had it in our environment. It simplifies managing our devices, simplifies the user login experience, and improves the quality of service. Users don't have to log in to each and every website individually with their credentials.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.