Jamf Connect Reviews

Normally, I use it for login. As an example, I can log in to my Mac using Jamf Connect. Also, single sign on. 

We also integrate and complete implementation for new clients.

We have a test environment where we implement Jamf Connect for new clients as needed. I am primarily involved in the implementation side, so I don't have extensive experience with all the features.

The multifactor authentication process in Jamf Connect is a useful feature, primarily for security purposes. It adds an extra layer of security compared to just entering a password. Our company definitely values and requires multifactor authentication to protect data.

There is room for improvement in the pricing. It could be a little lower.

I have been using it for four to five years now. 

The stability is good. You just need to know some information to use it effectively. It's good for users.

We haven't received any complaints from clients regarding issues with it. So far, it has been good and stable, with no issues.

Jamf Connect's expandability, or its ability to work with other tools and services, is good. I would rate it a ten out of ten. 

I would recommend it for medium-sized companies.

It's not too bad, but there is a delay in response to queries. We don't get responses as quickly as we would like. Compared to other tools like Microsoft, Jamf's support could be improved.

I can't compare Jamf Connect with any other product because it's specifically designed for Mac and integrates well with Jamf Pro. It's unique in that aspect.

The initial setup is very simple. I've done it many times. All the documentation is provided by Jamf, so anyone can do it. You just need to understand the background information on how it works.

If everything is clear from the client's end, like with Windows Server and Azure AD, it takes very little time. It's quickest when we have all the necessary information upfront.

Primarily, it's a product for macOS.

It's definitely on the higher side for clients. I would consider it a high price. If it were lower, it would be an improvement.

It is easy to integrate into any existing IT workflow.

I would give the tool itself a ten, but because of the support issues, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

Jamf Connect is utilized to connect devices to our corporate applications from a single device through the cloud. We have migrated approximately 400 users already, but we still have a few more to go.

The most valuable feature is the synchronization of passwords with a local password, which works well. This means that if people forget their passwords, it becomes easier to recover them as they are stored in the cloud, specifically Azure AD, and automatically synchronized.

Jamf Connect is beginning to implement Multi-Factor Authentication for offline authentication, but the setup documentation is insufficient. I would appreciate having more videos demonstrating how the offline MFA functions.

I have been using Jamf Connect for two years.

I rate Jamf Connect ten out of ten for stability. We have not had any issues.

I rate Jamf Connect ten out of ten for scalability.

The technical support is consistently reliable.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. 

The implementation was done through a local South African vendor that we always engage with for any major changes.

When compared to other solutions, the cost of Jamf Connect is low. I rate the cost as three out of ten, with ten being the highest.

I rate Jamf Connect ten out of ten.

We have 500 users and require two people for the maintenance of the solution.

There is nothing on the market as good as Jamf Connect for Apple devices, including Microsoft Intune.

Jamf Connect is a tool for authentication. Essentially, macOS devices use it to authenticate with your identity provider for accessing different services. You can use it to connect to your identity provider, such as Azure, and authenticate with your macOS devices using Azure Authenticator. The same applies to other authentication methods, like the one in Google. They enable authentication of macOS devices using the store.

It has a lot of features, but it's still simple to use.

The logs are an area with a shortcoming. The area that needs to be made simpler is while we are checking the logs to see what happened. Overall, it is performing very well for us.

There is one feature called FileVault login, but I'm not sure if it's a macOS limitation or if it is impacting Jamf Connect. I'm not certain about one thing, which is figuring out the behavior of the FileVault restart, like an authenticated restart.

I have been a customer of Jamf Connect for close to three years now. We are using the latest version.

It used to have bugs, but they were quickly resolved. I don't recall it ever breaking down significantly. There might have been a few individual cases, but those were quite rare. I rarely receive requests to fix any broken Jamf Connect because it is quite stable.

There are 2500 users using this solution.

I contacted customer service a time ago about some bug-related issues.

For the setup phase, you have a guide in the middle to guide you through. You can perform a super basic configuration for it, and it will still work. If you want to go super advanced, it can become a bit tricky, but it's not mandatory to do so. The initial setup is not super simple, but it's in the middle.

It does take some time to understand how it functions and to link it with your identity provider because you need to learn about the tool. It's not like you install it and go. You still need to configure it, but afterward, it requires zero maintenance.

It's a good and stable tool, so you should use it if you have a need. It's not complicated. It simply needs to authenticate the user, and it does its job.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten because it functions as it should. There are practically no issues with it.

We use the solution for user account authentication and deployment purposes.

The solution provides our customers with a seamless experience logging in with their existing credentials.

The solution's most valuable features are integration with an active directory and ease of deployment.

The solution's UI could be more user-friendly for the setup process.

We have been using the solution for a year.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten.

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward.

The solution's price is reasonable.

I advise others to use the solution for its support features. I rate it a ten out of ten.

We use the solution for Azure authentication. 

The tool supports different types of authentication. It also integrates seamlessly if you are using other Jamf products. 

We have faced issues with the product's configuration. If we use the tool with other business manager solutions, then there is the issue of naming conventions. The tool needs to be careful with newer updates so that it doesn't break any of the existing configurations. 

I have been using the product for two years. 

I would rate the product's stability a nine out of ten.

I would rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten. 

We contacted the tool's support regarding an issue with configuration and they were not able to trace the exact problem. 

The product's setup requires a lot of team coordination if your organization is big. We need to create applications in Azure AD and grant permissions so that the authentication process works seamlessly. The product's setup is straightforward and fast and depends on the documentation. The solution's deployment took around 10-15 days to complete. 

We pay 2 dollars per device monthly. For the plus version, you have to pay 4 dollars per month. I think the product will give discounts based on the number of users and devices. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

We required a solution during the pandemic to sync user local passwords with IDP passwords.  

The solution needs to improve its licensing. Instead of having separate licensing files for Jamf Pro and Jamf Connect compared to other MDMs. 

I have been working with the product for three years. 

I would rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has around 2000 users for the product. 

You can accomplish setup if you follow the tool's documentation. However, you will need to have three to four configuration profiles. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. 

We use Jamf Connect to provide Azure connectivity with MacOS devices. Azure Active Directory policy changes on Azure are reflected on the MacOS devices and user accounts. About 1,000 users at my organization use Jamf Conect to log in. Around 5 percent cannot use the solution because it's unavailable on their device.

The most valuable feature is ease of access. It's convenient to do things like resetting passwords. Previously, users were bound to their domain. We had to bind the user to the domain and log them in through the AD. Now, using Jamf Connect, we don't face any of these challenges. Resetting passwords is hassle-free so we can regularly rotate passwords according to best practices. 

We've had some issues when users restart their devices because the device asks for credentials afterward. Jamf Connect asks for a username, password, and MFA. 

I have worked with three all three Jamf products for the past year: Jamf Pro, Jamf Connect, and Jam Protect.

I rate Jamf Connect eight out of 10 for stability.

I rate Jamf Connect eight out of 10 for scalability.

I rate Jamf support nine out of 10. 

Positive

Deploying Jamf Connect isn't complex. 

I rate Jamf Connect eight out of 10. I like it better than any other MDM I've used for Apple devices. 

It's connection with Azure is the most valuable. It is easy to deploy and connect. 

The configuration could be faster. 

I have been using Jamf Connect for two years. 

It is stable solution. 

We shifted because of the availability of the solution. Also for its easy deployment. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

The pricing is good. 

It is a scalable solution. Not many users are using the solution.