It's scalable and very reliable.
Systems Analyst 4 at Utmb heath
It's scalable and reliable. The support that we get is important.
Pros and Cons
- "It's an awesome solution. Compared to everything else that's out there in the market right now, IBM MQ is hands down the best solution available and that's based on 40 years of IT experience."
- "I'd like to see the ability to build clusters made a little bit easier. It is kind of a manual process right now and this would just help save time and reduce resources."
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
The incredible support that we get from IBM is of primary importance, that I see, because anytime we have a problem, help is just a phone call away.
What needs improvement?
I'd like to see the ability to build clusters made a little bit easier. It is kind of a manual process right now and this would just help save time and reduce resources.
The process is only partially automated and still requires significant manual effort to complete the configuration of an operational WebSphere cluster.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have yet to max out the IBM MQ cluster. We have not been able to find the limits of the scalability yet.
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere Application Server
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about IBM WebSphere Application Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
902,456 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How are customer service and support?
We have used the technical support several times, successfully. It was great.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This solution was already in place when I was hired, so I didn't have a choice.
How was the initial setup?
It wasn't easy, but nothing in IT is. The setup was pretty straightforward and any problems that I had, I was able to find the answers on the IBM Website.
What other advice do I have?
It's an awesome solution. Compared to everything else that's out there in the market right now, IBM MQ is hands down the best solution available and that's based on 40 years of IT experience.
Invest in training. It's a complex product, but once you learn how it works, it's fantastic.
Reliability and the use of cutting-edge technology are important factors while selecting a vendor. Everything that's already in IBM MQ is state-of-the-art technology.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Web Administrator at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Easy to setup, stable solution, and offers VPN integration
Pros and Cons
- "The VPN service is quite useful."
- "Sometimes, I feel WebSphere runs a bit slow. It might be loading unnecessary libraries, impacting its performance compared to other application servers."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for a web application related to insurance.
What is most valuable?
The VPN service is quite useful. Our main application runs on a close integration with Jira platforms. To access it remotely, we need WebSphere and a VPN server.
What needs improvement?
Sometimes, I feel WebSphere runs a bit slow. It might be loading unnecessary libraries, impacting its performance compared to other application servers.
So, better performance is my main request.
For how long have I used the solution?
My company has been using this solution for five to six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Once it's up and running, it's quite stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable product. However, the IT team responsible for installation should have some knowledge of Unix operating systems since the platform runs on a Unix and Linux system.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is relatively easy. The complete deployment time depends on the application. Some might take as little as eight hours, while others require more time.
What about the implementation team?
We usually have a team of two or three people handling it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is a little expensive. I would rate the pricing a four out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM WebSphere Application Server Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2026
Popular Comparisons
IBM DataPower Gateway
Oracle WebLogic Server
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)
Oracle SOA Suite
Apache Web Server
IBM Open Liberty
Magic xpa Application Platform
Microsoft .NET Framework
IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Microsoft System Center
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM WebSphere Application Server Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which is better, IBM WebSphere Application Server or JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) when security is the main concern?
- When evaluating Application Server, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are the pros and cons of JBoss and Oracle Middleware?
- Resin vs WebLogic? Pros and Cons?
- Why is Application Server important for companies?









