Coverity Reviews

I am using the latest version for my business. I personally do product evaluations, and this product has improved the efficiency of my work.

The product improves the way that we do product evaluations.

It improves the quality of my work. 

They could improve the usability. For example, how you set things up, even though it's straightforward, it could be still be easier.

The stability works quite well.

The scalability is good enough.

We haven't had any problems with the product so far.

We did not have another solution before. We decided to purchase Coverity because the way we were working previously wasn't efficient. So, we were trying to improve our efficiency.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We have seen ROI.

The solution has helped to increase staff productivity and improved our work significantly by approximately 20 percent.

This solution seemed to fit our purposes.

Try it out for yourself, and decide whether it's useful for you.

We did a comprehensive evaluation on a number of critical parameters in the environment that we are in. Other popular tools that we evaluated failed to meet our expectations.

• Ease of development teams to adopt.
• Faster scanning
• Lowest false positives
• No unnecessary bloating of a huge defect list.

These have helped us to focus on the things which need attention.

• Lowest false positive rate
  
• Faster scanning time
• Inline context-sensitive help and other supportive artifacts which help developers.
• Customizable triage options
• Integrations with CI/CD tools, etc.

• Reporting engine needs to be more robust.
• Custom reporting is a must have.
• Perhaps, the availability of connectors to popular open source BI tools, such as BIRT, JasperReports, or Pentaho may add value.

We are working on medical devices, and the code base is written in C++. We use Coverity to find the vulnerability in those C++ codes.

Coverity is easy to set up and has a less lengthy process to find vulnerabilities.

The solution's user interface and quality gate could be improved.

I have been using Coverity for four months.

Coverity has good stability.

I rate Coverity more than eight out of ten for stability.

Around 20 to 25 developers use Coverity in our organization.

I rate Coverity a seven to eight out of ten for scalability.

We use SonarQube for Java-based projects and Coverity for C and C++-based projects.

The solution’s initial setup is simple.

Overall, I rate Coverity a seven out of ten.