We performed a comparison between StackPath WAF and Symantec Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."
"The solution has an up-to-date data repository to deal with external threats."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The setup was straightforward."
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."
"I'm not convinced that it's necessary the best solution going forward in the future."
"Sometimes scanning slows down the endpoints."
"It would be an improvement if the management dashboards were not reliant upon Java."
Earn 20 points
StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while Symantec Web Application Firewall is ranked 37th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). StackPath WAF is rated 9.0, while Symantec Web Application Firewall is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Web Application Firewall writes "An excellent up-to-date data repository handling external threats successfully". StackPath WAF is most compared with AWS WAF and Sucuri, whereas Symantec Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and WAPPLES.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
