We performed a comparison between SonarQube and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's enabled us to improve software quality and help us to disseminate best practices."
"We have worked with the support from SonarQube and we have had good experiences."
"SonarQube is scalable. My company has 50 users."
"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, easy to access, and they provide good training files."
"The most valuable function is its usability."
"Provides local scanning for developers."
"The most valuable features are the segregation containment and the suspension of product services."
"SonarQube is designed well making it easy to use, simple to identify issues and find solutions to problems."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"The stability is quite good."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"The security is good."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The solution could improve by providing more advanced technologies."
"Technical support and the price could be better."
"We could use some team support, but since we are using the community version, it's not available."
"It should be user-friendly."
"The implementation of the solution is straightforward. However, we did have some initial initialization issues at the of the projects. I don't think it was SonarQube's fault. It was the way it was implemented in our organization because it's mainly integrated with many software, such as Jira, Confluence, and Butler."
"The product's user documentation can be vastly improved."
"The solution could improve the management reports by making them easier to understand for the technical team that needs to review them."
"For improvement, this solution could be offered on Docker and the cloud and the support for this solution could be improved. Customizing rules could also be made simpler."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 12th in Application Security Tools with 17 reviews. SonarQube is rated 8.0, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Orca Security. See our SonarQube vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
