R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) vs w3af comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Rohde & Schwarz Logo
537 views|250 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
w3af Logo
341 views|178 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) and w3af based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
537
Comparisons
250
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
341
Comparisons
178
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn More
w3af
Video Not Available
Overview

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

w3af is a Web Application Attack and Audit Framework. The project's goal is to create a framework to help you secure your web applications by finding and exploiting all web application vulnerabilities. Our framework is proudly developed using Python to be easy to use and extend, and licensed under GPLv2.0.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm20%
Computer Software Company12%
Manufacturing Company12%
Government10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm18%
Computer Software Company16%
Media Company11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise70%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise61%
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while w3af is ranked 41st in Application Security Tools. R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0, while w3af is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of w3af writes "It's buggy and seems to try to do too many things, but having this on a USB drive has been valuable". R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector, whereas w3af is most compared with Acunetix.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.