• Home
  • R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) vs. SES WAF

R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) vs SES WAF comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) and SES WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
SeydouSidibe
Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available
By publishing the application without fear, my customer has created new revenue by making the website available anytime and anywhere. We noticed a... Read more →
Use SES WAF?
Questions from the Community
Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Read all 5 answers   →
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
32nd
out of 82 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
502
Comparisons
238
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
49th
out of 82 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Views
114
Comparisons
93
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn More
Rohde & Schwarz
United Security Providers
Video Not Available
Overview

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm20%
Computer Software Company12%
Manufacturing Company12%
Government10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise70%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 32nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while SES WAF is ranked 49th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0, while SES WAF is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". On the other hand, R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Akamai App and API Protector and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas SES WAF is most compared with Imperva Web Application Firewall.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.