We performed a comparison between Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."The solution's initial setup is straightforward, especially compared to Mule, which our team has worked with before and found to be a bit more complex in terms of setup."
"Easy to understand, very developer-friendly, and has a big forum community and lots of documentation for support."
"Integration with all systems is easy with Oracle Data Integrator, and it is easy to use. I have not used any other product, but with Oracle Data Integrator, we can easily connect to an ERP system, an SAP system, or a cloud application."
"In our DW/BI solution, ODI is the main tool to integrate the data in a daily batch way."
"The tool improved our data integration workflow primarily due to its compatibility with Oracle. Its integration makes it very convenient for analytics. Its most valuable feature is robust extended capability. The solution's debugging capabilities are good."
"Oracle provides great documentation."
"The CAEM is very useful in its modularity and portability."
"The most valuable feature that we use is the Knowledge Modules."
"OpenAPI supported me integrating Oracle Warehouse Builder with DevOps solutions like versioning (CVS, Subversion, and Git), ticket systems (Bugzilla and Jira), and test automatization (HPQC) as well as with professional ALM solutions (HP ALM and IKAN ALM)."
"If there was an add-on tool to hide the performance issues and solve them for me, then I might be interested in that as it would provide me value."
"It has been very good. Just recently, I've faced an issue, but I solved it somehow. While integrating with a file, I faced an issue where I wanted output files, and I had used the text field limited quotations, but at the end of the file, there was a line breakage for the last column. So, we just removed the text field because it was not working correctly for us."
"The stability of the software could be improved. Sometimes, the software just crashes. "
"At present, when multiple steps are executed in parallel in the load plan and errors occur, the error handling mechanism does not function correctly."
"Stability could be improved because some operators have issues."
"We used a third party to do the implementation of ODI."
"Technical Support could be better."
"The initial setup is a bit complex compared to other tools."
"Unfortunately, a next release of Oracle Warehouse Builder will not happen but a wide range of customers still use the available features together with the current Oracle 11g or 12c database environments."
More Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews while Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2, while Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] writes "Can be enhanced with extra functionality, but no further support will be given for the solution". Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Oracle Warehouse Builder [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.