We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Test and Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.OpenText Silk Test is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools while Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools. OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6, while Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". On the other hand, OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, OpenText UFT Developer, Apache JMeter and froglogic Squish, whereas Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and Wikidi Testomato.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.